700 Clark • End-of-April Special • April 30, 2026
| Record | Pythagorean W% | Luck Delta | Best Comp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18-13 | .491 | +.090 | 2001 |
| First month: March 26 – April 30, 31 games. 155 RS / 158 RA (5.00 / 5.10 per game). Historical comps use calendar April. | |||
| Year | April | Final | What Happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1934 | 4-7 | 95-58 | WS Champion — Gashouse Gang, worst April of any WS winner |
| 1985 | 8-11 | 101-61 | NL Champ — 9th in NL in April → pennant |
| 2002 | 12-14 | 97-65 | Div Champ — 10th in NL → division title |
| 1996 | 12-15 | 88-74 | Div Champ — 11th in NL → division title |
| 2004 | 12-11 | 105-57 | NL Champ — 8th in NL → 105 wins |
| 1983 | 10-6 | 79-83 | Missed — Hot April → losing season |
| 2026 | 18-13 | — | 3rd NL Central, winning above Pythagorean expectation |
Showing every Cardinals season where April W% was below .500 and the team made the postseason, plus the sharpest reverse (hot April, losing season). Full 127-season history at bases.chat.
Points below the diagonal = unlucky (won fewer than expected). 1985: 2.2 wins unlucky → 101 wins. 2026: 2.8 wins lucky over 31 games.
| Year | Games | Series (W-L-S) | Game W% | Srs W% | Delta | Story |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1931 | 8-3 | 3-0-1 | .727 | 1.000 | +.273 | WS Champion (101 W) |
| 1968 | 13-5 | 5-1-2 | .722 | .833 | +.111 | NL Champ → lost WS |
| 1967 | 9-6 | 5-2-0 | .600 | .714 | +.114 | WS Champion |
| 2015 | 15-6 | 6-0-1 | .714 | 1.000 | +.286 | Didn’t lose a single series |
| 2006 | 17-8 | 7-1-0 | .680 | .875 | +.195 | WS Champion |
| 2012 | 14-8 | 7-1-0 | .636 | .875 | +.239 | Wild Card → NLCS |
| 2008 | 18-11 | 6-1-3 | .621 | .857 | +.236 | Dominated series, missed playoffs |
| 2009 | 16-7 | 6-1-1 | .696 | .857 | +.161 | Div Champ |
| 1994 | 13-10 | 5-1-2 | .565 | .833 | +.268 | Biggest positive delta |
| 1982 | 14-7 | 5-3-0 | .667 | .625 | −.042 | WS Champion |
| 2011 | 16-11 | 6-3-0 | .593 | .667 | +.074 | WS Champion |
| 1985 | 8-11 | 3-4-0 | .421 | .429 | +.008 | NL Champ → 101 wins |
| 2021 | 14-12 | 3-5-1 | .538 | .375 | −.163 | Won games, lost series |
| 1934 | 4-7 | 1-3-1 | .364 | .250 | −.114 | Gashouse Gang → WS |
| 1919 | 1-6 | 0-2-0 | .143 | .000 | −.143 | Worst April in franchise history |
| 1973 | 3-15 | 0-6-1 | .167 | .000 | −.167 | Worst by volume (18 games) |
| 2025 | 14-17 | 5-5-0 | .452 | .500 | +.048 | Dead even in series |
| 2026 | 18-13 | 6-4-0 | .581 | .600 | +.019 | Winning series at same rate as games |
Delta = Series W% − Game W%. Positive = wins concentrated in series (quality indicator). Series = consecutive games vs same opponent at same site. Seasons selected for highest series W%, largest positive/negative deltas, and postseason teams. Full history at bases.chat.
| April Div Record | Seasons | Made Playoffs | Playoff Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Winning div record | 17 | 10 | 58.8% |
| Even | 4 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Losing div record | 7 | 3 | 42.9% |
Winning the division in April correlates with a 59% playoff rate — but losing it still yields 43%. The 2004 Cardinals went 3-5 vs. the division in April and won 105 games.
| Year | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | STL .720 | CHC .583 | MIL .519 | PIT .480 | CIN .407 |
| 2015 | STL .714 | CHC .600 | PIT .545 | CIN .500 | MIL .227 |
| 2006 | STL .680 | CIN .680 | CHC .565 | MIL .560 | PIT .269 |
| 2022 | MIL .682 | STL .550 | PIT .429 | CHC .381 | CIN .143 |
| 2024 | CHC .630 | MIL .577 | CIN .519 | STL .500 | PIT .370 |
| 2025 | CHC .625 | MIL .593 | CIN .519 | PIT .423 | STL .407 |
| 2023 | PIT .679 | MIL .667 | CHC .500 | CIN .444 | STL .357 |
| 2026 | CIN .645 | CHC .613 | STL .581 | MIL .533 | PIT .500 |
Years selected to show Cardinals at the top (2019, 2015, 2006), middle (2022, 2024), and bottom (2025, 2023) of the division in April. Cardinals led the NL Central in April in every season they won 95+ games except 2004. Full standings at bases.chat.
1934 Gashouse Gang (.364 April → WS), 1985 (.421 → NL Champ), 2002 (.462 → 97 wins). Cold Aprils that became great seasons.
2026 Cardinals (−0.10 R/G) land in the “Slightly Negative” tier. 464 team-seasons at this level averaged 77.7 wins with 14.0% playoff rate. 2,710 total team-seasons (1898–2025).
| Season | April | RS/G | RA/G | Season Result | Postseason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 18-13 | 5.00 | 5.10 | In progress | 3rd NL Central |
| 2001 | 12-12 | 5.17 | 5.21 | 93-69 (.574) | Wild Card |
| 1980 | 8-10 | 4.72 | 5.00 | 74-88 (.457) | — |
| 1994 | 13-9 | 4.86 | 5.41 | 53-61 (.465) | — |
| 1923 | 6-7 | 4.62 | 5.23 | 79-74 (.516) | — |
| 2002 | 12-14 | 4.65 | 4.88 | 97-65 (.599) | Div Champ |
Ranked by Euclidean distance on runs scored and runs allowed per game across all 127 Cardinals April seasons (1898–2025). 2026 uses full first month (March 26–April 30, 31 games); historical comps use calendar April. Full comp table at bases.chat.
| # | Player | Year | Age | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aledmys Diaz | 2016 | 25 | 75 | .423 | .453 | .732 | 1.155 | 4 |
| 2 | Albert Pujols | 2001 | 21 | 102 | .370 | .431 | .739 | 1.109 | 8 |
| 3 | Jeremy Hazelbaker | 2016 | 28 | 71 | .317 | .357 | .683 | 1.000 | 5 |
| 4 | Wally Moon | 1954 | 24 | 64 | .353 | .469 | .608 | .961 | 2 |
| 5 | Enos Slaughter | 1938 | 22 | 51 | .383 | .431 | .574 | .957 | 1 |
| 6 | JJ Wetherholt | 2026 | 23 | 121 | .247 | .383 | .485 | .868 | 6 |
| 7 | Ray Sanders | 1942 | 25 | 56 | .294 | .357 | .451 | .745 | 1 |
| 8 | Vince Coleman | 1985 | 23 | 55 | .300 | .364 | .400 | .700 | 0 |
| 9 | Jordan Walker | 2023 | 21 | 73 | .279 | .329 | .412 | .691 | 2 |
| 10 | Ken Boyer | 1955 | 24 | 56 | .245 | .250 | .396 | .641 | 1 |
| # | Player | Year | Age | PA | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stan Musial | 1958 | 37 | 61 | .528 | 4 | 10 | 1.396 | Best ever, at 37 |
| 2 | Albert Pujols | 2006 | 26 | 110 | .346 | 14 | 32 | 1.260 | 14 HR in one April |
| 3 | Rogers Hornsby | 1924 | 28 | 67 | .429 | 4 | 14 | 1.250 | Peak years |
| 4 | Mark McGwire | 2000 | 36 | 70 | .320 | 8 | 20 | 1.180 | Late career |
| 5 | Jim Edmonds | 2003 | 33 | 84 | .391 | 5 | 17 | 1.159 | |
| 6 | Jim Edmonds | 2000 | 30 | 103 | .382 | 8 | 22 | 1.158 | |
| 7 | Aledmys Diaz | 2016 | 25 | 75 | .423 | 4 | 13 | 1.155 | Rookie breakout |
| 8 | Lance Berkman | 2011 | 35 | 95 | .388 | 8 | 22 | 1.153 | WS Champion season |
| 9 | Stan Musial | 1957 | 36 | 46 | .476 | 2 | 10 | 1.143 | Back-to-back 36-37 |
| 10 | Fernando Tatis Sr. | 2000 | 25 | 87 | .375 | 6 | 28 | 1.139 | |
| — | Iván Herrera | 2026 | 25 | 121 | .267 | 4 | 10 | .911 | Best on ’26 club |
| — | Jordan Walker | 2026 | 23 | 110 | .283 | 8 | 20 | .890 | 8 HR, 20 RBI |
Musial at 37 and Berkman at 35 had no business being this good. Pujols at 21 (see Debut Aprils above) is the best rookie April in franchise history. Full leaderboard at bases.chat.
| # | Pitcher | Year | GS | IP | ERA | K | K/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lon Warneke | 1939 | 2 | 18.0 | 0.00 | 5 | 2.50 |
| 2 | Max Lanier | 1946 | 3 | 27.0 | 0.00 | 16 | 5.33 |
| 3 | Dizzy Dean | 1937 | 3 | 28.0 | 0.32 | 22 | 7.07 |
| 4 | Red Ames | 1917 | 3 | 20.2 | 0.44 | 9 | 3.92 |
| 5 | Mort Cooper | 1943 | 2 | 19.1 | 0.47 | 7 | 3.26 |
| 6 | Flint Rhem | 1927 | 2 | 18.0 | 0.50 | 6 | 3.00 |
| 7 | Carlos Martinez | 2018 | 5 | 33.1 | 0.54 | 35 | 9.45 |
| 8 | Joe Kelly | 2014 | 3 | 15.1 | 0.59 | 9 | 5.28 |
| 9 | Cy Young | 1900 | 3 | 28.0 | 0.64 | 10 | 3.21 |
| 10 | Sonny Gray | 2024 | 4 | 23.1 | 1.16 | 32 | 12.34 |
| — | Michael McGreevy | 2026 | 5 | 27.1 | 3.62 | 16 | 5.27 |
| # | Pitcher | Year | G | IP | ERA | SV | K/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alex Reyes | 2021 | 12 | 12.1 | 0.00 | 6 | 10.22 |
| 2 | Todd Worrell | 1992 | 10 | 11.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 9.82 |
| 3 | Ryan Franklin | 2009 | 10 | 10.1 | 0.00 | 7 | 7.84 |
| 4 | Mike Matthews | 2001 | 10 | 13.0 | 0.00 | 0 | 7.62 |
| 5 | Lindy McDaniel | 1960 | 7 | 11.2 | 0.00 | 3 | 4.63 |
| 6 | T.J. Mathews | 1996 | 12 | 17.1 | 0.52 | 1 | 9.35 |
| 7 | John Brebbia | 2019 | 13 | 15.1 | 0.59 | 0 | 11.15 |
| 8 | Ryan Helsley | 2024 | 15 | 15.0 | 0.60 | 10 | 10.20 |
| 9 | Dennis Eckersley | 1996 | 12 | 13.1 | 0.68 | 5 | 10.13 |
| 10 | Larry McWilliams | 1988 | 9 | 20.1 | 0.44 | 1 | 3.54 |
| — | Gordon Graceffo | 2026 | 12 | 16.1 | 1.10 | 1 | 4.96 |
| — | Riley O’Brien | 2026 | 12 | 12.0 | 1.50 | 7 | 11.25 |
| Pitcher | Year | GS | IP | ERA | K | K/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rene Arocha | 1993 | 3 | 21.2 | 1.66 | 11 | 4.57 |
| Donovan Osborne | 1992 | 4 | 21.0 | 1.71 | 9 | 3.86 |
| Matt Morris | 1997 | 4 | 17.0 | 2.65 | 12 | 6.35 |
| Vinegar Bend Mizell | 1952 | 2 | 15.1 | 3.52 | 10 | 5.87 |
| Pitcher | Year | G | IP | ERA | SV | K/9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Urrea | 1977 | 7 | 12.1 | 0.00 | 3 | 5.11 |
| Andre Pallante | 2022 | 6 | 10.0 | 0.90 | 0 | 6.30 |
| Jordan Hicks | 2018 | 11 | 13.1 | 1.35 | 0 | 4.05 |
| Seunghwan Oh | 2016 | 12 | 13.0 | 1.38 | 0 | 13.15 |
| Kyle McClellan | 2008 | 12 | 15.2 | 1.72 | 1 | 7.47 |
| Eduardo Sanchez | 2011 | 7 | 10.0 | 1.80 | 1 | 15.30 |
WPA measures how much each plate appearance shifted the team’s chance of winning. RE24 = runs above average by the 24 base-out states. Clutch = WPA minus context-neutral WPA. RE24 requires a full season of play-by-play data to build the run expectancy matrix; 2026 values are not yet available.
| Player | Year | PA | WPA | Avg LI | RE24 | Clutch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Nootbaar | 2025 | 99 | +1.826 | 1.12 | -1.2 | +0.872 |
| Albert Pujols | 2006 | 107 | +1.715 | 1.11 | 25.1 | +0.712 |
| Jim Edmonds | 2004 | 99 | +1.638 | 0.98 | 11.8 | +0.856 |
| Albert Pujols | 2003 | 115 | +1.570 | 1.08 | 13.0 | +0.711 |
| Fernando Vina | 2000 | 117 | +1.555 | 1.04 | 8.3 | +0.630 |
| Pedro Guerrero | 1992 | 109 | +1.541 | 1.36 | 14.5 | +0.449 |
| Albert Pujols | 2009 | 93 | +1.530 | 1.13 | 15.4 | +0.498 |
| Jim Bottomley | 1928 | 93 | +1.488 | 1.20 | 16.6 | +0.341 |
| Frankie Frisch | 1930 | 102 | +1.456 | 1.04 | 10.0 | +0.571 |
| Yadier Molina | 2012 | 81 | +1.420 | 1.22 | 10.4 | +0.505 |
| JJ Wetherholt | 2026 | 144 | +1.236 | 1.10 | N/A* | +1.335 |
Nootbaar 2025 leads all-time — high WPA but negative RE24 means his value came almost entirely from clutch timing. Pujols appears three times (2003, 2006, 2009). *RE24 requires a complete season of play-by-play data to build the run expectancy matrix; 2026 values will be available after the season.
Wetherholt leads the first month at +1.236 WPA across 144 plate appearances — over a full win added to the team’s bottom line, just outside the franchise’s all-time top 10 for any April. His Clutch score of +1.335 means the bulk of that value came from delivering in high-leverage spots; his context-neutral line is slightly negative (−0.099), meaning his raw production was roughly average but his timing was excellent.
The other notable Clutch number belongs to Masyn Winn at +1.026 across 113 plate appearances. His context-neutral WPA is −0.266 — a below-average hitter by aggregate production who has been considerably better when it mattered. His walk-off single on April 1st, his extra-inning double on April 19th: those moments are the difference between a negative-WPA hitter and the team’s second-most valuable bat.
| Player | Year | BF | WPA | Avg LI | RE24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Carpenter | 2006 | 163 | +1.855 | 1.06 | -12.4 |
| Curt Simmons | 1963 | 139 | +1.620 | 1.06 | -12.6 |
| Dave Giusti | 1969 | 130 | +1.554 | 1.31 | -8.2 |
| Ray Washburn | 1963 | 132 | +1.530 | 0.84 | -12.8 |
| Dizzy Dean | 1937 | 111 | +1.492 | 1.08 | -12.8 |
| John Tudor | 1990 | 105 | +1.423 | 1.15 | -10.6 |
| Kyle Lohse | 2012 | 127 | +1.421 | 1.14 | -11.0 |
| Jose DeLeon | 1989 | 153 | +1.417 | 0.96 | -10.3 |
| Bob Gibson | 1969 | 168 | +1.383 | 1.05 | -10.6 |
| Carlos Martinez | 2018 | 134 | +1.327 | 1.00 | -13.1 |
| Gordon Graceffo | 2026 | 62 | +0.994 | 0.81 | N/A* |
Carpenter 2006 is the WPA king. CMart 2018 had the best RE24 (-13.1 = most runs prevented). Gibson 1969 faced the most batters (168) in April.
Graceffo leads the pitching staff with +0.994 WPA across 62 batters faced, but his story has an interesting twist when you look at leverage. His average LI of 0.81 means he was deployed in lower-leverage situations — the Oli Marmol staff used him when the game wasn’t hanging in the balance, and he was dominant in that role. His context-neutral WPA of +1.156 actually exceeds his game-state WPA, meaning he was even better than his WPA suggests, just in situations that mattered less to the outcome.
O’Brien is the inverse. His 1.60 average LI was the highest on the staff — he was consistently deployed in the tightest spots. His +0.939 WPA across 59 batters faced reflects strong overall performance under pressure, though when you isolate the 27 at-bats with LI above 1.5, he was essentially flat (−0.041). He dominated in medium-leverage situations and held his own in the highest-stakes moments without adding to his total.
| Player | Year | Inn | Event | WPA | LI | WE Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Schoendienst | 1961 | 11th | 2B | +.916 | 1.97 | .085 → 1.000 |
| Frankie Frisch | 1932 | 9th | 2B | +.833 | 6.53 | .167 → 1.000 |
| Jimmy Sheckard | 1913 | 10th | 1B | +.807 | 2.77 | .194 → 1.000 |
| Felix Jose | 1991 | 9th | HR | +.806 | 4.87 | .194 → 1.000 |
| Johnny Mize | 1937 | 9th | 1B | +.745 | 10.06 | .255 → 1.000 |
| Albert Pujols | 2006 | 9th | HR | +.693 | 5.81 | .307 → 1.000 |
| Tim McCarver | 1974 | 10th | 1B | +.648 | 2.77 | .194 → .841 |
| Gerald Perry | 1991 | 9th | 3B | +.622 | 5.81 | .307 → .929 |
| Julio Gonzalez | 1982 | 9th | 3B | +.599 | 2.84 | .083 → .682 |
| Reggie Sanders | 2004 | 8th | 3B | +.563 | 7.90 | .376 → .939 |
Every single one is a late-inning, trailing moment. Mize’s 1937 single had 10.06 LI — 2 outs, bases loaded, 9th inning. Schoendienst’s 11th-inning double is the highest-WPA April at-bat in franchise history.
| Player | Year | BF | WPA | Avg LI | Hi-Lev PA | Hi-Lev WPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward Mujica | 2013 | 36 | +1.485 | 2.21 | 20 | +1.476 |
| Lee Smith | 1991 | 47 | +1.292 | 1.79 | 18 | +0.849 |
| Mark Littell | 1979 | 49 | +1.290 | 1.94 | 29 | +1.336 |
| John Gant | 2019 | 59 | +1.295 | 1.37 | 17 | +0.910 |
| Joe Hoerner | 1969 | 28 | +1.173 | 1.68 | 12 | +0.940 |
| Ryan Franklin | 2009 | 37 | +1.128 | 1.50 | 17 | +0.981 |
| Todd Worrell | 1992 | 39 | +1.099 | 1.46 | 19 | +0.918 |
| Lee Smith | 1992 | 42 | +1.048 | 2.66 | 34 | +0.810 |
| T.J. Mathews | 1996 | 68 | +1.057 | 1.68 | 27 | +0.686 |
| Kyle Leahy | 2025 | 60 | +1.023 | 1.21 | 14 | +0.464 |
| Riley O’Brien | 2026 | 59 | +0.939 | 1.60 | 27 | −0.041 |
Mujica 2013: 2.21 avg LI means nearly every appearance was high-leverage. Lee Smith 1992 had the highest avg LI (2.66) — used almost exclusively in the biggest spots. 2026 O’Brien: all values computed from unified 31-game normalization (2,438 plays).
O’Brien’s presence on the firemen table tells a story about deployment. His overall first-month WPA of +0.939 is excellent and his 1.60 average LI is the highest on the staff — he was the go-to arm in tight games. When you isolate the 27 batters he faced with LI above 1.5, he was essentially flat (−0.041). That’s not a knock; holding even in the highest-leverage spots while accumulating heavy positive WPA everywhere else is a valuable profile. Volume of exposure matters: 27 high-leverage plate appearances in a single month is a heavy workload, and he didn’t crack.
Clutch = WPA − (WPA ÷ LI). Measures how much a hitter overperformed in high-leverage spots beyond what their overall production would predict.
| # | Player | Year | PA | WPA | Avg LI | RE24 | Clutch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe Thurston | 2009 | 62 | +0.681 | 0.97 | 2.1 | +2.244 |
| 2 | Ken Boyer | 1964 | 58 | +0.038 | 1.15 | 5.7 | +1.975 |
| 3 | Justin Williams | 2021 | 76 | -0.350 | 0.85 | -0.8 | +1.950 |
| 4 | Red Schoendienst | 1952 | 57 | -0.013 | 1.10 | 2.4 | +1.866 |
| 5 | Paul Goldschmidt | 2019 | 114 | -0.101 | 0.96 | 5.1 | +1.853 |
| 6 | Miller Huggins | 1912 | 59 | -0.079 | 1.10 | 1.2 | +1.845 |
| 7 | Albert Pujols | 2007 | 105 | -1.155 | 1.14 | 5.8 | +1.547 |
| 8 | Tino Martinez | 2002 | 101 | -0.063 | 1.10 | -5.1 | +1.480 |
| 9 | Edgar Renteria | 2003 | 115 | +0.289 | 0.99 | 9.8 | +1.376 |
| 10 | Albert Pujols | 2001 | 102 | -0.632 | 0.94 | 12.3 | +1.295 |
| — | Masyn Winn | 2026 | 113 | +0.760 | 1.00 | N/A* | +1.026 |
Ken Boyer’s 1964 WS-champion April is the franchise clutch king. Miller Huggins (1912) and Red Schoendienst (1952) prove the metric works across eras. Pujols still appears twice. Williams 2021: negative WPA overall but huge clutch — awful in low-leverage, came through when it mattered.
Masyn Winn’s +1.026 Clutch score across 113 plate appearances is among the highest on the roster. What makes it notable is where the value comes from: his context-neutral WPA is −0.266, meaning that if you stripped away the game state and just measured his hitting, he was below average. But when you weight by leverage — when it mattered — he was the team’s second-most valuable bat.
The question for May: is Winn a clutch performer, or did the first month’s close games happen to align with his best swings? Clutch as a skill is one of the most debated concepts in baseball analytics. The research says it’s mostly timing — but the Cardinals’ 6-2 record in one-run games wouldn’t exist without it.
| Year | Home | Home W% | Road | Road W% | Gap | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 7-1 | .875 | 0-5 | .000 | +.875 | Missed |
| 1912 | 4-1 | .800 | 1-7 | .125 | +.675 | Missed |
| 1985 | 7-3 | .700 | 1-8 | .111 | +.589 | NL Champ |
| 1941 | 3-3 | .500 | 7-0 | 1.000 | -.500 | Missed |
| 1969 | 1-8 | .111 | 8-4 | .667 | -.556 | Missed |
| 2004 | 5-9 | .357 | 7-2 | .778 | -.421 | NL Champ |
| 1968 | 9-1 | .900 | 4-4 | .500 | +.400 | WS Champ |
| 2025 | 7-4 | .636 | 4-12 | .250 | +.386 | Missed |
| 2006 | 12-4 | .750 | 5-4 | .556 | +.194 | WS Champ |
| 2011 | 6-5 | .545 | 10-5 | .667 | -.122 | WS Champ |
| 2026 | 7-8 | .467 | 11-5 | .688 | -.221 | In progress |
Seasons selected for the largest home-road W% gaps (positive and negative) plus postseason teams with extreme splits. 1960: .875 home, .000 road — the biggest split in franchise April history. 1941: 7-0 on the road, the only perfect April road record. All 127 seasons at bases.chat.
| Year | 1-Run W | 1-Run L | 1-Run W% | Non-1R W% | Total | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1934 | 0 | 4 | .000 | .571 | 4-7 | WS Champ |
| 1930 | 0 | 4 | .000 | .600 | 6-8 | Missed |
| 1973 | 0 | 6 | .000 | .250 | 3-15 | Missed |
| 2003 | 1 | 7 | .125 | .688 | 12-12 | NL Champ |
| 1936 | 5 | 1 | .833 | .200 | 6-5 | Missed |
| 2011 | 3 | 5 | .375 | .722 | 16-10 | WS Champ |
| 2012 | 1 | 4 | .200 | .765 | 14-8 | NL Champ |
| 1946 | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | .556 | 9-4 | WS Champ |
| 1982 | 6 | 2 | .750 | .615 | 14-7 | WS Champ |
| 2019 | 5 | 1 | .833 | .684 | 18-7 | NL Champ |
| 1985 | 2 | 5 | .286 | .500 | 8-11 | NL Champ |
| 2025 | 2 | 4 | .333 | .429 | 11-16 | Missed |
| 2026 | 6 | 2 | .750 | .522 | 18-13 | In progress |
Seasons selected for extreme one-run W% (very high or very low) and the biggest gaps between one-run and non-close W%. 1934 Gashouse Gang: 0-4 in one-run games → won the World Series. One-run record is classic noise. All 127 seasons at bases.chat.
| Year | Games | STL Leading | Tied | STL Trailing | Avg Lead | Avg Deficit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 26 | 11 (42%) | 14 | 1 (4%) | 1.82 | -1.00 |
| 2007 | 24 | 9 (38%) | 14 | 1 (4%) | 1.78 | -1.00 |
| 1973 | 18 | 8 (44%) | 9 | 1 (6%) | 2.13 | -1.00 |
| 2004 | 23 | 10 (43%) | 7 | 6 (26%) | 1.30 | -1.83 |
| 2001 | 24 | 11 (46%) | 7 | 6 (25%) | 1.55 | -1.50 |
| 1948 | 8 | 3 (38%) | 5 | 0 (0%) | — | — |
| 2025 | 27 | 7 (26%) | 16 | 4 (15%) | 2.00 | -1.50 |
| 2008 | 29 | 2 (7%) | 18 | 9 (31%) | 1.00 | -2.00 |
| 2000 | 25 | 4 (16%) | 8 | 13 (52%) | 2.00 | -2.38 |
| 2006 | 25 | 4 (16%) | 10 | 11 (44%) | 2.25 | -1.64 |
| 2023 | 28 | 4 (14%) | 15 | 9 (32%) | 1.75 | -1.78 |
| 2026 | 31 | 5 (16%) | 21 | 5 (16%) | 1.60 | -1.80 |
Seasons selected for the best and worst “led after 1st / trailed after 1st” ratios. 2002 and 2007: led 10+ times, trailed just once each. 1948: never trailed. 2008: led after the 1st in only 2 of 29 games. Play-by-play data from 1910. All 116 seasons at bases.chat.
Tonight: STL vs LAD, Game 1 of 3 -- Busch Stadium -- 7:15 PM CT
NL CENTRAL STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reds | 20-11 | - | W1 |
| Cubs | 19-12 | 1.0 | W2 |
| Cardinals | 18-13 | 2.0 | W4 |
| Brewers | 16-14 | 3.5 | W1 |
| Pirates | 16-16 | 4.5 | L5 |
NL WEST STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodgers | 20-11 | - | L2 |
| Padres | 19-11 | 0.5 | L2 |
| D-backs | 16-14 | 3.5 | L1 |
| Rockies | 14-18 | 6.5 | L1 |
| Giants | 13-18 | 7.0 | L3 |
RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)
| Date | Opp | H/A | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30 | PIT | Away | W 10-5 |
| Apr 29 | PIT | Away | W 5-4 |
| Apr 28 | PIT | Away | W 11-7 |
| Apr 27 | PIT | Away | W 4-2 |
| Apr 26 | SEA | Home | L 2-3 |
| Apr 25 | SEA | Home | L 9-11 |
| Apr 24 | SEA | Home | L 2-3 |
| Apr 22 | MIA | Away | L 1-4 |
| Apr 21 | MIA | Away | W 5-3 |
| Apr 20 | MIA | Away | L 3-5 |
STARTING PITCHERS
Matthew Liberatore (L, STL)
2026 to date: 0-1, 4.75 ERA, 30.1 IP, 19 K, 11 BB, 8 HR, 1.55 WHIP across 6 starts -- 14.1% K%, 8.1% BB%, 42.0% GB%. The K-rate is well below his career line (18.8% on 151.2 IP), and the 8 HR allowed in 30.1 IP is the structural concern. 2025 baseline platoon: vs RHB .265 / .304 / .426 (.691 OPS, 515 PA), vs LHB .274 / .348 / .410 (.684 OPS, 133 PA) -- minimal platoon spread. 2025 home/away nearly even (3.69 home / 4.03 away).
Emmet Sheehan (R, LAD)
2026 to date: 2-0, 4.78 ERA, 26.1 IP, 28 K, 9 BB, 4 HR, 1.25 WHIP across 5 starts -- 25.5% K%, 8.2% BB%, 50.0% GB%. The K-rate is the carry skill. 2025 baseline platoon: vs LHB .180 / .289 / .333 (.513 OPS, 128 PA), vs RHB .225 / .267 / .348 (.573 OPS, 202 PA) -- both sides suppressed, slight reverse-platoon at OPS. 2025 home/away is the lopsided split: home 2.08 ERA / 47.2 IP / 57 K; away 4.64 ERA / 33.0 IP / 38 K. Today is at Busch -- the away (worse) context for Sheehan.
EXPECTED LINEUPS
Cardinals (Projected from 2026-04-30)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wetherholt | 2B | L | .273 | .764 |
| 2 | Herrera | C | R | .250 | .805 |
| 3 | Burleson | 1B | L | .366 | .998 |
| 4 | Walker | RF | R | .237 | .743 |
| 5 | Urías | 3B | R | .000 | .154 |
| 6 | Winn | SS | R | .222 | .572 |
| 7 | Pozo | DH | R | .222 | .555 |
| 8 | Saggese | LF | R | .176 | .457 |
| 9 | Scott | CF | L | .111 | .338 |
Handedness: 6 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Urías, Winn, Pozo, Saggese), 3 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Scott).
Dodgers (From active roster)
12 players listed from active roster pool. Actual game lineup will be 9 from this group.
| Player | Pos | Bats |
|---|---|---|
| Call | LF | R |
| Freeland | 2B | S |
| Pages | CF | R |
| Rushing | C | L |
| Freeman | 1B | L |
| Kim | SS | L |
| Tucker | RF | L |
| Muncy | 3B | L |
| Rojas | SS | R |
| Espinal | 3B | R |
| Hernández | LF | R |
| Smith | C | R |
Handedness: 6 RHB (Call, Pages, Rojas, Espinal, Hernández, Smith), 5 LHB (Rushing, Freeman, Kim, Tucker, Muncy).
INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES
No Phase 2 injury web search performed for this run. JSON does not carry an injury list.
2A: BVP -- CARDINALS BATTERS VS OPPONENT STARTER
| Player | PA | AB | H | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Herrera | 3 | 3 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Yohel Pozo | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Masyn Winn | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Alec Burleson | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Ramon Urias | 2 | 2 | 1 | .500 | .500 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Walker | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Small sample: Ivan Herrera (3 PA), Yohel Pozo (2 PA), Masyn Winn (2 PA), Alec Burleson (2 PA), Ramon Urias (2 PA), Jordan Walker (2 PA).
No Cardinals starter has more than 3 PA against Sheehan. Every line is small-sample. Herrera (0-for-3, 3 K) and Burleson (0-for-2) are the only rows with strikeouts; Urias is 1-for-2 with a double-equivalent SLG, but two-PA samples carry no signal. Wetherholt, Scott, and Saggese -- No data. The matchup turns on platoon, TTO, and Sheehan's 2025 home/away split, not on BvP history.
Bench note: No bench BvP rows beyond the projected starters appear in the JSON.
2B: BVP -- OPPONENT BATTERS VS CARDINALS STARTER
| Player | PA | AB | H | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Espinal | 6 | 6 | 1 | .167 | .167 | .167 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Tucker | 6 | 6 | 1 | .167 | .167 | .167 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Freddie Freeman | 6 | 5 | 4 | .800 | .833 | .800 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Will Smith | 5 | 4 | 2 | .500 | .600 | .500 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Teoscar Hernandez | 4 | 4 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Miguel Rojas | 3 | 3 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andy Pages | 2 | 2 | 1 | .500 | .500 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Freeland | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alex Call | 2 | 2 | 1 | .500 | .500 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Small sample: Santiago Espinal (6 PA), Kyle Tucker (6 PA), Freddie Freeman (6 PA), Will Smith (5 PA), Teoscar Hernandez (4 PA), Miguel Rojas (3 PA), Andy Pages (2 PA), Alex Freeland (2 PA), Alex Call (2 PA).
BvP danger -- Freeman vs Liberatore. 6 PA, 5 AB, 4 H, 0 HR, 0 BB, 0 K -- .800 / .833 / .800. Below the formal 10-PA / .400 threshold, but the lone real career sample in the Dodgers lineup against Liberatore. Smith (.500 in 5 PA) is the second-highest line, also below threshold. Every other Dodgers row is at 6 PA or fewer.
Freeman is the lead. 4-for-5 with 0 K is the kind of look that historically translates to a present-day approach edge -- the swing decisions are baked in. Smith at 2-for-4 with a walk in 5 PA is the secondary note. Tucker, Espinal, Hernandez, Rojas, Freeland are all 0-for or below the Mendoza in their few PA but at sample sizes that don't predict tonight. Pages 1-for-2 and Call 1-for-2 are decoration.
Bench note: No additional opponent BvP samples in the JSON beyond the rows above.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- CARDINALS
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson L | 419 | .296 | .353 | .478 | 15 | 32 | 59 |
| Masyn Winn R | 374 | .251 | .309 | .368 | 7 | 23 | 71 |
| Victor Scott L | 332 | .221 | .310 | .317 | 5 | 31 | 75 |
| Ivan Herrera R | 328 | .268 | .343 | .399 | 10 | 24 | 66 |
| Jordan Walker R | 289 | .200 | .263 | .291 | 4 | 21 | 94 |
| Ramon Urias R | 273 | .233 | .278 | .367 | 7 | 17 | 57 |
| Thomas Saggese R | 227 | .254 | .305 | .340 | 1 | 15 | 63 |
| Yohel Pozo R | 126 | .217 | .254 | .358 | 4 | 6 | 16 |
Sheehan is right-handed, so this is the Cardinals' 2025 vs-RHP profile. Burleson (.296 / .353 / .478, 419 PA) is again the only bat with a clean RHP line at volume; Herrera (.268 / .343 / .399, 328 PA) is the second-best vs-RHP option. The structural soft spot is Walker -- .200 / .263 / .291 in 289 PA with a 32.5%-equivalent K rate (94 K), which lines up cleanly with Sheehan's 2025 25.5%-2026 K%. Sheehan vs RHB suppresses to .225 / .267 / .348 (.573 OPS), so the right-handed bulk of the order (6 of 9) is heading into the harder side.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- OPPONENT
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Tucker L | 208 | .272 | .367 | .467 | 9 | 25 | 32 |
| Freddie Freeman L | 206 | .283 | .345 | .503 | 9 | 16 | 50 |
| Andy Pages R | 167 | .287 | .317 | .394 | 3 | 6 | 37 |
| Teoscar Hernandez R | 148 | .255 | .291 | .461 | 7 | 6 | 27 |
| Miguel Rojas R | 142 | .289 | .355 | .500 | 6 | 13 | 17 |
| Will Smith R | 129 | .252 | .380 | .421 | 4 | 21 | 32 |
| Alex Call R | 128 | .306 | .360 | .459 | 4 | 10 | 22 |
| Santiago Espinal R | 126 | .265 | .317 | .342 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Max Muncy R | 44 | .200 | .273 | .275 | 1 | 4 | 14 |
| Dalton Rushing L | 41 | .171 | .244 | .171 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| Hyeseong Kim L | 21 | .381 | .381 | .571 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Alex Freeland B | 16 | .143 | .250 | .143 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Liberatore is left-handed, so this is the Dodgers' 2025 vs-LHP profile. Freeman (.283 / .345 / .503, 206 PA, 9 HR) is the best LHB-vs-LHP line in the lineup -- a meaningful note since most LHBs lose ground against LHP. Tucker (.272 / .367 / .467, 208 PA, 9 HR) is the comparable other-side LHB. On the right-handed side, Call (.306 / .360 / .459 in 128 PA), Rojas (.289, 142 PA, 6 HR), and Pages (.287, 167 PA) all hit LHP at quality lines. Liberatore vs LHB allowed .274 / .348 / .410 (.684 OPS) in 2025 -- the lefties on this Dodgers roster are not a hand-side advantage for him.
2D: PITCHER PLATOON SPLITS
| Pitcher | vs | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Liberatore | vs RHB | 515 | .265 | .304 | .426 | .691 | 16 | 93 |
| Matthew Liberatore | vs LHB | 133 | .274 | .348 | .410 | .684 | 3 | 29 |
| Emmet Sheehan | vs LHB | 128 | .180 | .289 | .333 | .513 | 3 | 38 |
| Emmet Sheehan | vs RHB | 202 | .225 | .267 | .348 | .573 | 4 | 57 |
Liberatore's 2025 platoon split is essentially flat: vs RHB .691 OPS, vs LHB .684 OPS. He does not get the typical reverse-LHP advantage and walks LHB at a higher rate (.348 OBP vs LHB vs .304 vs RHB). The Dodgers' 5 LHB / 6 RHB roster mix is therefore neutral against him -- there is no exploitable hand-side seam. Sheehan is the inverse story: vs LHB .513 OPS (.180 / .289 / .333) and vs RHB .573 OPS (.225 / .267 / .348). The Cardinals' 6-RHB / 3-LHB lineup leans into the slightly-less-suppressed RHB side, but both lines are well below average regardless.
2D-HA: PITCHER HOME/AWAY SPLITS
| Pitcher | Split | BF | IP | ERA | K | BB | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Liberatore | Away | 334 | 76.0 | 4.03 | 59 | 26 | 11 |
| Matthew Liberatore | Home | 314 | 75.2 | 3.69 | 63 | 14 | 8 |
| Emmet Sheehan | Away | 143 | 33.0 | 4.64 | 38 | 15 | 5 |
| Emmet Sheehan | Home | 187 | 47.2 | 2.08 | 57 | 12 | 2 |
Tonight's game is at Busch -- Liberatore at home, Sheehan on the road. Sheehan's home/away split in 2025 is the loudest line on either staff: 2.08 ERA at home (47.2 IP, 57 K, 2 HR) vs 4.64 ERA away (33.0 IP, 38 K, 5 HR). The HR rate doubles on the road. Liberatore's split is small (3.69 home / 4.03 away, ~30 IP each) -- venue does not move him much. The structural read is that the Cardinals are catching Sheehan in the worse half of his split.
2E: TTO SPLITS (TIMES THROUGH ORDER)
| Pitcher | TTO | PA | AVG | SLG | OPS | HR | K | BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Liberatore | TTO1 | 264 | .237 | .376 | .613 | 8 | 56 | 15 |
| Matthew Liberatore | TTO2 | 252 | .310 | .511 | .821 | 9 | 40 | 17 |
| Matthew Liberatore | TTO3 | 132 | .244 | .353 | .597 | 2 | 26 | 8 |
| Emmet Sheehan | TTO1 | 168 | .242 | .373 | .615 | 3 | 45 | 12 |
| Emmet Sheehan | TTO2 | 119 | .196 | .346 | .542 | 3 | 36 | 10 |
| Emmet Sheehan | TTO3 | 43 | .105 | .211 | .316 | 1 | 14 | 5 |
Liberatore's 2025 TTO arc is the cliff-and-recovery shape: TTO1 .237 / .376 / .613 (264 PA), TTO2 .310 / .511 / .821 (252 PA -- the cliff), TTO3 .244 / .353 / .597 (132 PA -- a recovery, but partly because he rarely sees a third pass). The window of damage is innings 4-6. Today the Dodgers' top of the order would reach TTO2 in those frames; that is where the score is likely to move.
Sheehan is the inverse: TTO1 .242 / .373 / .615 (168 PA) is the rockiest pass, TTO2 .196 / .346 / .542 (119 PA) tightens, TTO3 .105 / .211 / .316 (43 PA) is dominant on a small sample. He gets stronger as the game progresses. The Cardinals' chance is the first three innings -- the first pass through the order is the highest-OPS window against him.
2F: INHERITED RUNNERS PROFILE
| Reliever | IR | Scored | Strand% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | 29 | 11 | 62.1% |
| JoJo Romero | 26 | 3 | 88.5% |
| Matt Svanson | 26 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Gordon Graceffo | 11 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Riley O'Brien | 10 | 3 | 70.0% |
| Michael McGreevy | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
League-average strand rate is roughly 68-72%. Romero (88.5% on 26 IR) is the high-leverage choice on an inherited-runner moment. Svanson (50.0% on 26 IR) and Graceffo (54.5% on 11 IR) are the low-strand arms to avoid in those spots. Leahy (62.1%) is the soft middle. With Liberatore's TTO2 cliff sitting in innings 4-6 against a .283-.287 LHB-vs-LHP top of the order (Freeman, plus the RHB Pages and Call), the bullpen choice in the middle innings is a real fork.
2G: BATTED BALL MATCHUP
Pitcher Batted Ball Profiles (Career)
| Pitcher | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Liberatore | 463 | 39.1% | 31.3% | 27.6% |
| Emmet Sheehan | 199 | 35.2% | 35.7% | 28.6% |
Hitter Batted Ball Results (Career) -- LAD
| Hitter | GB AVG | LD AVG | FB AVG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Call | .235 | .684 | .141 |
| Santiago Espinal | .306 | .500 | .048 |
| Alex Freeland | .353 | .600 | .111 |
| Freddie Freeman | .279 | .667 | .119 |
| Teoscar Hernandez | .222 | .649 | .087 |
| Hyeseong Kim | .351 | .586 | .250 |
| Max Muncy | .190 | .586 | .143 |
| Andy Pages | .258 | .592 | .096 |
| Miguel Rojas | .239 | .597 | .069 |
| Dalton Rushing | .267 | .600 | .167 |
| Will Smith | .362 | .688 | .100 |
| Kyle Tucker | .185 | .628 | .122 |
Liberatore's career batted-ball profile is the second-most fly-ball-leaning configuration of any starter the Cardinals have rolled out this stretch (39.1% GB, 31.3% FB, 27.6% LD on 463 BIP), and he has already allowed 8 HR in 30.1 IP this year. The career LD-AVG numbers in the Dodgers room are uniformly elevated -- Smith .688, Call .684, Freeman .667, Tucker .628 -- so the path of damage is clear: line drives, with the long ball tail. Sheehan's career mix (35.2% GB, 35.7% FB, 28.6% LD on 199 BIP) is balanced; against the Cardinals lineup, Herrera's career 52.6% GB rate (in 2M) is the highest in the room and the one most likely to put a ball on the ground.
2H: BATTERY PAIRING
| Catcher | G | IP | ERA | AVG | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Pagés | 15 | 75.2 | 3.93 | .279 | -- | -- |
| Yohel Pozo | 12 | 63.2 | 4.10 | .259 | -- | -- |
| Jimmy Crooks | 2 | 11.0 | 2.45 | .225 | -- | -- |
Tonight's projected catcher per the lineup is Ivan Herrera (2-hole), who does not appear in the Liberatore battery table -- the listed pairings are Pedro Pagés (75.2 IP, 3.93 ERA), Yohel Pozo (63.2 IP, 4.10 ERA), and Jimmy Crooks (11.0 IP, 2.45 ERA). With Pagés currently absent from the lineup pool and Pozo slotted at DH, the Liberatore-Herrera battery is the de facto starting combo and is not summarized in the table. Treat the table as historical context, not a tonight-specific read.
2I: BASERUNNING MATCHUP
Kyle Tucker -- 25 SB, 3 CS, 89.3% success rate. The premier active runner in the Dodgers room; reaches against Liberatore and the steal threat is on every pitch. Liberatore is left-handed, so the pickoff move is the structural counter -- but Tucker's success rate is high enough that the threat doesn't go away.
Andy Pages -- 14 SB, 7 CS, 66.7%. Modest success rate, but volume is real.
Hyeseong Kim -- 13 SB, 1 CS, 92.9%. Highest success rate on the roster; speed is the carry skill.
Freddie Freeman -- 6 SB, 2 CS, 75.0%. Modest but live.
Miguel Rojas -- 5 SB, 0 CS, 100%. Small-volume but perfect.
Teoscar Hernandez -- 5 SB, 2 CS, 71.4%. Occasional runner.
Santiago Espinal -- 2 SB, 1 CS, 66.7%. Negligible.
Alex Call -- 2 SB, 1 CS, 66.7%. Negligible.
Tucker and Kim are the names to anticipate. Herrera behind the plate plus the LHP Liberatore is a partial counter to the Tucker threat -- but a 89% career rate is loud regardless.
2J: DEFENSIVE CONTEXT
| Player | POS | G | DP | E | Fld% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Scott | CF | 136 | 3 | 6 | 0.982 |
| Masyn Winn | SS | 129 | 64 | 3 | 0.994 |
| Jordan Walker | RF | 108 | 2 | 4 | 0.981 |
| Ramon Urias | 3B | 78 | 20 | 4 | 0.979 |
| Alec Burleson | 1B | 50 | 27 | 4 | 0.990 |
| Yohel Pozo | C | 46 | 0 | 5 | 0.982 |
| Alec Burleson | LF | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Thomas Saggese | 2B | 35 | 24 | 4 | 0.973 |
| Alec Burleson | RF | 34 | 1 | 1 | 0.983 |
| Thomas Saggese | SS | 33 | 7 | 1 | 0.988 |
| Ramon Urias | 2B | 26 | 7 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Thomas Saggese | 3B | 18 | 0 | 2 | 0.939 |
| Ivan Herrera | C | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0.989 |
| Victor Scott | RF | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Yohel Pozo | 1B | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Victor Scott | LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Ivan Herrera | LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Ramon Urias | 1B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | P | 1 | 0 | 0 | -- |
Tonight's defensive alignment per the Cardinals lineup: Wetherholt 2B (no fielding sample in the table), Herrera C, Burleson 1B, Walker RF, Urias 3B, Winn SS, Saggese LF, Scott CF. Winn at SS (.994 fielding pct, 64 DP in 129 G) and Burleson at 1B (.990 in 50 G) anchor the infield. Wetherholt is starting at 2B; the 2B fielding samples in the table belong to Saggese (.973 in 35 G) and Urias (1.000 in 26 G), not to tonight's starter at the position. The skeleton fielding table is reference material; the lineup card is authoritative.
2K: BALLPARK CONTEXT & HEAD-TO-HEAD
Busch Stadium plays as a slightly pitcher-leaning venue historically -- a qualitative read; no numeric park factor in the JSON. Recent head-to-head record by season: 2025 STL 4-2, 2024 STL 2-5, 2023 STL 3-4, 2022 STL 2-4. The 2025 line is the only winning split in the four-year window.
2L: BATTER K%/BB% PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson | 544 | 79 | 14.5% | 39 | 7.2% |
| Masyn Winn | 537 | 102 | 19.0% | 34 | 6.3% |
| Victor Scott | 463 | 111 | 24.0% | 42 | 9.1% |
| Ivan Herrera | 450 | 84 | 18.7% | 43 | 9.6% |
| Jordan Walker | 396 | 126 | 31.8% | 29 | 7.3% |
| Ramon Urias | 391 | 88 | 22.5% | 27 | 6.9% |
| Thomas Saggese | 295 | 83 | 28.1% | 16 | 5.4% |
| Yohel Pozo | 168 | 22 | 13.1% | 7 | 4.2% |
Sheehan's 2025 K-rate against RHB (28.2%-equivalent on 57 K / 202 PA) and 2026 K% (25.5%) line up against a Cardinals bat group where Walker (31.8%), Saggese (28.1%), and Scott (24.0%) are the strikeout exposures. Burleson (14.5% 2025 K%) and Pozo (13.1%) are the contact bats; if anyone is going to tag Sheehan in the first pass, those are the names.
Dodgers
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freddie Freeman | 627 | 128 | 20.4% | 60 | 9.6% |
| Andy Pages | 624 | 135 | 21.6% | 29 | 4.6% |
| Kyle Tucker | 595 | 88 | 14.8% | 87 | 14.6% |
| Teoscar Hernandez | 545 | 134 | 24.6% | 26 | 4.8% |
| Will Smith | 436 | 89 | 20.4% | 64 | 14.7% |
| Santiago Espinal | 328 | 38 | 11.6% | 21 | 6.4% |
| Alex Call | 322 | 55 | 17.1% | 36 | 11.2% |
| Miguel Rojas | 317 | 46 | 14.5% | 24 | 7.6% |
| Max Muncy | 220 | 68 | 30.9% | 10 | 4.5% |
| Hyeseong Kim | 170 | 52 | 30.6% | 7 | 4.1% |
| Dalton Rushing | 155 | 58 | 37.4% | 10 | 6.5% |
| Alex Freeland | 97 | 35 | 36.1% | 11 | 11.3% |
Tucker (14.6% 2025 BB%) and Smith (14.7%) are the patient bats Liberatore must respect; combined with his 2025 vs-LHB .348 OBP, walks are a real path to base for the Dodgers. Espinal (11.6% K%, 6.4% BB%) is the toughest contact out. The strikeout exposure clusters in the bench/depth pieces -- Rushing 37.4%, Freeland 36.1%, Muncy 30.9%, Kim 30.6% -- but Liberatore's 14.1% 2026 K% / 18.8% career K% is not the strikeout profile to capitalize on those rates.
2M: BATTER BATTED BALL PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson | 398 | 42.0% | 33.4% | 24.6% |
| Masyn Winn | 376 | 39.6% | 34.0% | 26.3% |
| Ivan Herrera | 285 | 52.6% | 21.8% | 25.6% |
| Victor Scott | 259 | 40.2% | 32.0% | 27.8% |
| Ramon Urias | 253 | 45.1% | 29.2% | 25.7% |
| Jordan Walker | 231 | 48.9% | 29.4% | 21.6% |
| Thomas Saggese | 189 | 41.8% | 29.6% | 28.6% |
| Yohel Pozo | 133 | 40.6% | 33.1% | 26.3% |
Sheehan's 2026 GB% (50.0%) leans heavier than his career profile (35.2%) and stacks well against Herrera's 52.6% career GB rate -- the catcher's at-bats are the most plausible double-play sources. Burleson (42.0% career GB) and Pozo (40.6%) are the closest-to-balanced profiles in this lineup.
Dodgers
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Pages | 459 | 38.8% | 34.0% | 27.2% |
| Freddie Freeman | 455 | 43.3% | 29.7% | 27.0% |
| Kyle Tucker | 412 | 36.7% | 35.9% | 27.4% |
| Teoscar Hernandez | 396 | 50.0% | 26.3% | 23.7% |
| Will Smith | 295 | 35.6% | 37.3% | 27.1% |
| Santiago Espinal | 259 | 42.9% | 32.4% | 24.7% |
| Miguel Rojas | 247 | 45.7% | 29.1% | 25.1% |
| Alex Call | 219 | 44.7% | 29.2% | 26.0% |
| Max Muncy | 127 | 49.6% | 27.6% | 22.8% |
| Hyeseong Kim | 106 | 53.8% | 18.9% | 27.4% |
| Dalton Rushing | 80 | 37.5% | 37.5% | 25.0% |
| Alex Freeland | 45 | 37.8% | 40.0% | 22.2% |
Liberatore's 31.3% career FB% and 8 HR allowed in 30.1 IP this year run into a Dodgers room with three FB-leaning bats: Smith 37.3%, Tucker 35.9%, Pages 34.0%. Tucker (.122 career FB AVG, 9 HR vs LHP in 2025) and Smith (.100 FB AVG, 4 HR vs LHP in 2025) are the launch-angle threats. Freeman's profile is balanced (43.3% GB, 29.7% FB, 27.0% LD) -- the line drives are the path of damage given his .667 career LD AVG and 4-for-5 BvP line. Hernandez's 50.0% career GB and Kim's 53.8% are ground-ball sources that benefit Liberatore if his sinker is on.
2N: PITCHER K%/BB% PROFILE
| Pitcher | IP | K | K% | BB | BB% | K/BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Liberatore | 151.2 | 122 | 18.8% | 40 | 6.2% | 3.05 |
| Emmet Sheehan | 73.1 | 89 | 30.6% | 22 | 7.6% | 4.05 |
Liberatore's 2026 to date: 0-1, 4.75 ERA, 19 K, 11 BB in 30.1 IP -- 14.1% K%, 8.1% BB%. Career baseline (151.2 IP): 18.8% K%, 6.2% BB%, 3.05 K/BB. The 2026 K-rate has dropped meaningfully from the career line, and the BB-rate is up; the 8 HR in 30.1 IP is the structural risk. Sheehan's 2026 to date: 2-0, 4.78 ERA, 28 K, 9 BB in 26.1 IP -- 25.5% K%, 8.2% BB%. Career baseline (73.1 IP): 30.6% K%, 7.6% BB%, 4.05 K/BB. The K-rate gap (Sheehan's 25.5%-2026 / 30.6%-career vs Liberatore's 14.1%-2026 / 18.8%-career) is the structural mismatch of this game; the offset is Sheehan's road ERA and Liberatore's HR rate.
KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST
Freeman vs Liberatore (career BvP). 6 PA, 5 AB, 4 H, 0 HR, 0 BB, 0 K -- .800 / .833 / .800. Below the formal 10-PA / .400 BvP-danger threshold, but the only real career sample in the Dodgers lineup against Liberatore. Pairs with Freeman's 2025 vs-LHP profile (.283 / .345 / .503, 9 HR in 206 PA). The lead matchup of the night.
Walker vs Sheehan (platoon + K-rate). 2 PA career line is empty signal. The real read is Walker's 2025 vs-RHP line (.200 / .263 / .291, 31.8% K%) running into Sheehan's 2026 25.5% K% / career 30.6%. The 4-spot is the rough at-bat tonight.
Burleson vs Sheehan (lone Cardinals contact bat). 14.5% K% career, .296 / .353 / .478 vs RHP in 2025. Even on Sheehan's home line (where he's been dominant), Burleson's contact profile is the one swing the Cardinals trust against an above-average K-rate righty.
Tucker on the bases. 89.3% career SB success rate. Liberatore is left-handed, which is the structural counter to a left-handed runner -- pickoff move plays better than a slide step. But Tucker's volume (25 SB / 3 CS) is loud enough that the threat is live the moment he reaches first.
Sheehan home/away split. 2.08 ERA at home, 4.64 ERA away (2025). Today is at Busch -- the away half. The HR rate doubles on the road. If Sheehan is going to be hit, it's the early innings here, not the third pass through the order where he tightens.
Liberatore TTO2 cliff. 2025 second pass: .310 / .511 / .821 in 252 PA. Innings 4-6 are where Freeman and the Dodgers' top of the order would reach TTO2; the bullpen choice (Romero 88.5% strand vs Svanson 50.0%) shapes whether the score moves there.
QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES
1. How has Freddie Freeman performed against Matthew Liberatore in their career?
2. How has Emmet Sheehan fared against Jordan Walker in their career?
3. What are Matthew Liberatore's second-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?
4. What are Emmet Sheehan's home/away splits in 2025?
5. What is Kyle Tucker's stolen-base rate in 2025?
6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?
7. What is the home run park factor at Busch Stadium in 2025?
700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025