NL CENTRAL STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brewers | 58-34 | - | L1 |
| Cubs | 52-40 | 6.0 | W3 |
| Cardinals | 48-43 | 9.5 | W1 |
| Pirates | 47-46 | 11.5 | L1 |
| Reds | 42-49 | 15.5 | W1 |
RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)
| Date | Opp | H/A | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8 | MIL | Home | W 5-1 |
| Jul 7 | MIL | Home | L 3-4 |
| Jul 7 | MIL | Home | L 2-10 |
| Jul 6 | MIL | Home | L 3-4 |
| Jul 5 | CHC | Away | L 4-6 |
| Jul 4 | CHC | Away | W 3-0 |
| Jul 3 | CHC | Away | W 17-1 |
| Jul 2 | ATL | Away | W 11-5 |
| Jul 1 | ATL | Away | L 1-5 |
| Jun 30 | ATL | Away | W 5-3 |
STARTING PITCHERS
Andre Pallante (R) -- Cardinals
2026 to date: 10-5, 3.60 ERA in 95.0 IP, 70 K / 27 BB, 1.22 WHIP, 60.2% GB rate across 17 starts. He is the club's most durable groundball workload and his 2026 season line is well ahead of his career norm. 2025 baseline: 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB in 162.2 IP. Signature profile is heavy contact-and-ground -- 61.2% GB in the career sample -- which puts pressure on the infield defense to convert.
Logan Henderson -- Brewers
2026 to date: 2-1, 2.74 ERA in 23.0 IP, 30 K / 6 BB, 1.04 WHIP across 5 starts. Very short profile overall -- 25.1 IP in the 2025 sample too. That 2025 line: 33.3% K%, 8.1% BB%, 4.13 K/BB. Extreme air-ball tendency (21.8% GB, 47.3% FB career), meaning fewer worm-burners than Pallante and more decisions in the outfield.
EXPECTED LINEUPS
Cardinals (Projected from 2026-07-08)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wetherholt | 2B | L | .316 | .887 |
| 2 | Herrera | DH | R | .222 | .717 |
| 3 | Burleson | 1B | L | .350 | .931 |
| 4 | Walker | RF | R | .327 | 1.075 |
| 5 | Nootbaar | LF | L | .115 | .558 |
| 6 | Winn | SS | R | .227 | .647 |
| 7 | Crooks | C | L | .333 | 1.052 |
| 8 | Gorman | 3B | L | -- | -- |
| 9 | Church | CF | L | .275 | .762 |
Handedness: 3 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Winn), 6 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Nootbaar, Crooks, Gorman, Church).
Brewers (Projected from 2026-07-08)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Vaughn | 1B | R | .265 | .747 |
| None | Perkins | CF | S | -- | -- |
| None | Turang | 2B | L | .325 | 1.013 |
| None | Yelich | DH | L | .286 | .777 |
| None | Pratt | SS | R | .111 | .349 |
| None | Hamilton | 3B | L | -- | -- |
| None | Mitchell | CF | L | .319 | .954 |
| None | Sánchez | C | R | .262 | .992 |
| None | Chourio | LF | R | .254 | .691 |
| None | Bauers | 1B | L | .300 | 1.066 |
| None | Ortiz | SS | R | .218 | .652 |
| None | Frelick | RF | L | .227 | .545 |
| None | Contreras | C | R | .281 | .812 |
Handedness: 6 RHB (Vaughn, Pratt, Sánchez, Chourio, Ortiz, Contreras), 6 LHB (Turang, Yelich, Hamilton, Mitchell, Bauers, Frelick), 1 SHB (Perkins).
INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES
Both lineup cards are projected from the prior day's game. No injury or roster-move data is available for tonight; play what actually posts closer to first pitch.
Series context: Milwaukee leads the 5-game set 3-1. Tonight is the finale at Busch.
2A: BVP -- CARDINALS BATTERS VS OPPONENT STARTER
No data available for this section.
No Cardinals batter has ever faced Logan Henderson in the career BvP sample -- Henderson has only 25.1 IP on record, so the empty sheet is expected, not a data gap. The scouting angle has to come from his 2025 splits (Section 2D, 2E) rather than history.
Bench note: No bench BvP history against Henderson either. Fermin, Jordan, Velazquez, Pages, and Torres are all first looks.
2B: BVP -- OPPONENT BATTERS VS CARDINALS STARTER
| Player | PA | AB | H | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brice Turang | 13 | 13 | 5 | .385 | .385 | .462 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Christian Yelich | 12 | 12 | 2 | .167 | .167 | .417 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| William Contreras | 13 | 12 | 3 | .250 | .308 | .583 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sal Frelick | 11 | 9 | 1 | .111 | .273 | .222 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Jackson Chourio | 11 | 5 | 3 | .600 | .727 | 1.000 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Garrett Mitchell | 6 | 5 | 2 | .400 | .500 | .400 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joey Ortiz | 6 | 4 | 1 | .250 | .250 | .250 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jake Bauers | 5 | 3 | 1 | .333 | .600 | .667 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gary Sánchez | 2 | 2 | 1 | .500 | .500 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Small sample: Garrett Mitchell (6 PA), Joey Ortiz (6 PA), Jake Bauers (5 PA), Gary Sánchez (2 PA).
Chourio has done everything but hit a homer against Pallante: 3-for-5 with 5 walks in 11 career PA (.727 OBP, 1.000 SLG). That is the one at-bat to circle every time he stands in. Turang (5-for-13, .385) is the other real threat -- also with essentially no swing-and-miss (1 K). Yelich and Contreras each own a career HR off Pallante in double-digit PA, which is why the .167 and .250 averages still look scary in the SLG column.
Bench note: Bauers (5 PA, .333/.600/.667) and Mitchell (6 PA, .400/.500/.400) both have promising small samples if they enter late. Ortiz (.250) and Sanchez (2 PA) are neutral.
DANGER BAT: Jackson Chourio
.600 AVG / .727 OBP / 1.000 SLG in 11 PA against Pallante. Only 5 official at-bats -- the walks are doing much of the work -- but the walk rate itself is the tell: Pallante has not been able to find the strike zone with anything Chourio respects. In an 11 PA sample, 5 unintentional walks is a signal, not noise. Do not give him extra pitches; if it looks like a two-strike battle, take it.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- CARDINALS
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson L | 419 | .296 | .353 | .478 | 15 | 32 | 59 |
| Lars Nootbaar L | 403 | .249 | .340 | .394 | 10 | 47 | 72 |
| Masyn Winn R | 374 | .251 | .309 | .368 | 7 | 23 | 71 |
| Iván Herrera R | 328 | .268 | .343 | .399 | 10 | 24 | 66 |
| Jordan Walker R | 289 | .200 | .263 | .291 | 4 | 21 | 94 |
| Nathan Church L | 51 | .114 | .216 | .182 | 1 | 3 | 14 |
| Jimmy Crooks L | 38 | .108 | .132 | .162 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Henderson is right-handed, so the 2025 vs-RHP sample is what applies. Burleson leads the group at .296/.353/.478 in 419 PA -- the deepest and cleanest lefty profile Cardinals have. Nootbaar's OBP (.340) plays even when the average dips. Walker is the RHB most exposed, .200 in 289 PA vs RHP. Wetherholt and Gorman have no 2025 vs-RHP sample yet, and both start tonight -- they are profile bets, not history bets.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- OPPONENT
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Contreras R | 502 | .263 | .349 | .409 | 14 | 59 | 92 |
| Brice Turang L | 489 | .274 | .352 | .447 | 16 | 53 | 117 |
| Jackson Chourio R | 464 | .249 | .283 | .435 | 16 | 20 | 91 |
| Christian Yelich L | 461 | .271 | .356 | .493 | 25 | 51 | 114 |
| Sal Frelick L | 442 | .278 | .342 | .421 | 12 | 38 | 59 |
| Joey Ortiz R | 380 | .203 | .261 | .272 | 5 | 26 | 57 |
| Andrew Vaughn R | 335 | .227 | .272 | .385 | 12 | 19 | 64 |
| Jake Bauers L | 214 | .244 | .360 | .428 | 8 | 31 | 56 |
| Gary Sánchez R | 59 | .245 | .322 | .491 | 4 | 2 | 16 |
| Garrett Mitchell L | 54 | .208 | .278 | .333 | 0 | 5 | 21 |
Pallante is right-handed. Milwaukee's 2025 vs-RHP profiles read heavy at the top -- Contreras .263/.349/.409, Turang .274/.352/.447, Yelich .271/.356/.493 with 25 HR. Chourio has the loudest slug (.435) in 464 PA. Ortiz (.203) and Mitchell (.208) are the two soft spots in the split. Perkins and Hamilton have no 2025 vs-RHP sample.
2D: PITCHER PLATOON SPLITS
| Pitcher | vs | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan Henderson | vs LHB | 60 | .167 | .250 | .352 | .602 | 3 | 18 |
| Logan Henderson | vs RHB | 39 | .216 | .256 | .216 | .472 | 0 | 15 |
| Andre Pallante | vs LHB | 347 | .266 | .329 | .434 | .763 | 10 | 60 |
| Andre Pallante | vs RHB | 368 | .275 | .345 | .429 | .774 | 11 | 51 |
Henderson runs a small but strong platoon profile: .167 AVG / .602 OPS vs LHB in 60 PA, with 3 HR allowed being the only worry point, and .216 / .472 OPS vs RHB in 39 PA. The Cardinals stack 6 LHB tonight -- historically Henderson's stronger side by average, but also the side where his 3 HR have landed. Pallante is essentially neutral (.774 vs RHB, .763 vs LHB), which fits his heavy-contact ground-ball profile.
2D-HA: PITCHER HOME/AWAY SPLITS
| Pitcher | Split | BF | IP | ERA | K | BB | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan Henderson | Away | 59 | 14.1 | 2.51 | 17 | 5 | 2 |
| Logan Henderson | Home | 40 | 11.0 | 0.82 | 16 | 3 | 1 |
| Andre Pallante | Away | 375 | 84.2 | 4.89 | 67 | 35 | 11 |
| Andre Pallante | Home | 340 | 78.0 | 5.42 | 44 | 27 | 10 |
Tonight's game is at Busch Stadium. Henderson pitching away (2.51 ERA in 14.1 IP road career), Pallante pitching at home (5.42 ERA in 78.0 IP career). Pallante's split is the outlier here: he has actually been meaningfully worse at home than on the road across the career sample, and the K/9 tells the same story (44 K in 78 home IP vs 67 K in 84.2 road IP).
2E: TTO SPLITS (TIMES THROUGH ORDER)
| Pitcher | TTO | PA | AVG | SLG | OPS | HR | K | BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan Henderson | TTO1 | 45 | .143 | .214 | .414 | 1 | 17 | 3 |
| Logan Henderson | TTO2 | 45 | .268 | .439 | .772 | 2 | 11 | 4 |
| Logan Henderson | TTO3 | 9 | .000 | .000 | .111 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Andre Pallante | TTO1 | 279 | .266 | .393 | .720 | 6 | 35 | 21 |
| Andre Pallante | TTO2 | 270 | .309 | .487 | .868 | 8 | 46 | 27 |
| Andre Pallante | TTO3 | 166 | .217 | .408 | .691 | 7 | 30 | 14 |
Both starters share a second-pass problem in 2025. Henderson: .143 AVG on the first pass through the order, .268 AVG on the second pass -- and the third-pass sample (9 PA) is basically nonexistent because he has not been asked to work that deep. Pallante's second-pass line is worse -- .309 / .868 OPS -- and his third-pass numbers actually rebound (.217 AVG). Both games likely turn in innings 4-6.
2F: INHERITED RUNNERS PROFILE
| Reliever | IR | Scored | Strand% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | 29 | 11 | 62.1% |
| JoJo Romero | 26 | 3 | 88.5% |
| Matt Svanson | 26 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Gordon Graceffo | 11 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Riley O'Brien | 10 | 3 | 70.0% |
| Michael McGreevy | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Romero (88.5%) sits well above league average (~68-72% strand rate). Svanson (50.0%) and Graceffo (54.5%) are the two arms most likely to concede an inherited run. The decision point tonight is who Marmol reaches for if Pallante puts runners on in the fifth or sixth -- Romero is the answer that keeps damage contained; the other two open the door.
2G: BATTED BALL MATCHUP
Pitcher Batted Ball Profiles (Career)
| Pitcher | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logan Henderson | 55 | 21.8% | 47.3% | 29.1% |
| Andre Pallante | 515 | 61.2% | 18.3% | 19.6% |
Hitter Batted Ball Results (Career) -- MIL
| Hitter | GB AVG | LD AVG | FB AVG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Bauers | .188 | .765 | .070 |
| Jackson Chourio | .307 | .581 | .101 |
| William Contreras | .241 | .651 | .067 |
| Sal Frelick | .269 | .682 | .076 |
| Garrett Mitchell | .200 | .636 | .182 |
| Joey Ortiz | .281 | .449 | .087 |
| Gary Sánchez | .222 | 1.000 | .000 |
| Brice Turang | .327 | .609 | .077 |
| Andrew Vaughn | .197 | .659 | .059 |
| Christian Yelich | .245 | .632 | .125 |
Pallante's 61.2% career GB rate collides with a Milwaukee lineup led by ground-ball hitters. Yelich hits the ball on the ground more than most (62.3% GB in 2025) and gets very little out of his fly balls (.125 career on FB). That is a Pallante-friendly profile. The exception is Chourio, whose GB average (.307 career) is the highest in the group -- a groundball off Pallante is not a certain out from his bat. Turang's .327 GB AVG is the same problem. On the Cardinals side, Henderson's 47.3% career FB rate meets a lineup with modest fly-ball tendencies (Nootbaar 35.4%, Burleson 33.4% in 2025) -- more flies means more park factor exposure.
2H: BATTERY PAIRING
| Catcher | G | IP | ERA | AVG | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Pagés | 15 | 76.1 | 4.60 | .257 | -- | -- |
| Yohel Pozo | 8 | 37.2 | 6.93 | .303 | -- | -- |
| Jimmy Crooks | 5 | 23.1 | 4.24 | .258 | -- | -- |
| Iván Herrera | 5 | 23.2 | 4.56 | .271 | -- | -- |
Tonight's scheduled catcher is Jimmy Crooks. Yohel Pozo appears in the pairing data (8 G, 37.2 IP) but is not on the current active roster; his line reflects earlier-season work. Among catchers still on the roster, Crooks has the lowest ERA with Pallante (4.24 in 5 games) and Herrera (4.56) is close behind. Pages carries the largest sample (15 G, 4.60 ERA). Small samples throughout -- this is a call-sequencing story more than an ERA story, and Crooks is the reader to trust with his 2025 pairing.
2I: BASERUNNING MATCHUP
Milwaukee is the running team in this matchup. 2025 SB leaders in the lineup:
-- Brice Turang: 24 SB, 8 CS, 75.0% success rate. The lineup's top volume threat.
-- Jackson Chourio: 21 SB, 7 CS, 75.0% success rate. Danger-bat and danger-runner in one.
-- Sal Frelick: 19 SB, 6 CS, 76.0% success rate.
-- Christian Yelich: 16 SB, 6 CS, 72.7% success rate.
-- Joey Ortiz: 14 SB, 3 CS, 82.4% success rate.
-- Jake Bauers: 8 SB, 1 CS, 88.9% success rate.
-- William Contreras: 6 SB, 4 CS, 60.0% success rate.
-- Garrett Mitchell: 3 SB, 0 CS, 100% success rate.
Cardinals catcher is Crooks, and Pallante's 60.2% GB rate this year has kept opposing runners in check by design -- fewer strikes on the ground means fewer stealing situations. The tension tonight is whether the Brewers cash in the running-game leverage on any early walk or single.
2J: DEFENSIVE CONTEXT
| Player | POS | G | DP | E | Fld% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masyn Winn | SS | 129 | 64 | 3 | 0.994 |
| Jordan Walker | RF | 108 | 2 | 4 | 0.981 |
| Lars Nootbaar | LF | 107 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | 1B | 50 | 27 | 4 | 0.990 |
| Alec Burleson | LF | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | RF | 34 | 1 | 1 | 0.983 |
| Lars Nootbaar | RF | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Nathan Church | CF | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Jimmy Crooks | C | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Iván Herrera | C | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0.989 |
| Lars Nootbaar | CF | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0.967 |
| Nathan Church | RF | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0.833 |
| Nathan Church | LF | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Iván Herrera | LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | P | 1 | 0 | 0 | -- |
Tonight's Cardinals alignment (per the projected card): Winn at SS, Walker at RF, Nootbaar at LF, Burleson at 1B, Church in CF, Crooks behind the plate. With Pallante on the mound and a 60.2% GB rate this year, the infield does the heaviest lifting -- Winn's 129 games at short with 64 DP and just 3 E (.994 Fld%) is the anchor. Burleson at 1B (50 G, .990) is the other big groundball converter. Church in CF has a clean 18-game sample. Herrera is at DH tonight, not behind the plate.
2K: BALLPARK CONTEXT & HEAD-TO-HEAD
Busch Stadium plays historically as a pitcher-leaning venue. The available data does not carry a numeric park factor, so treat it qualitatively -- neither a home-run haven nor a bat-suppressing extreme. Recent head-to-head against Milwaukee: 6-7 in 2025, 5-8 in 2024, 5-8 in 2023, 10-9 in 2022. The Brewers have won each of the last three season series. Tonight's 5-game set is set to fall to Milwaukee 3-2 or 4-1 depending on the result.
2L: BATTER K%/BB% PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Nootbaar | 583 | 119 | 20.4% | 64 | 11.0% |
| Alec Burleson | 544 | 79 | 14.5% | 39 | 7.2% |
| Masyn Winn | 537 | 102 | 19.0% | 34 | 6.3% |
| Iván Herrera | 450 | 84 | 18.7% | 43 | 9.6% |
| Jordan Walker | 396 | 126 | 31.8% | 29 | 7.3% |
| Nathan Church | 65 | 18 | 27.7% | 3 | 4.6% |
| Jimmy Crooks | 46 | 17 | 37.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
Two 2025 K% flags on the Cardinals side: Crooks (37.0%) and Walker (31.8%) both above the 25% high-K threshold. Nootbaar (11.0% BB%) is the walk anchor. Crooks' 0.0% BB% in 46 PA is a small-sample outlier to note against a strike-thrower like Henderson.
Brewers
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brice Turang | 659 | 150 | 22.8% | 66 | 10.0% |
| William Contreras | 659 | 120 | 18.2% | 84 | 12.7% |
| Christian Yelich | 644 | 167 | 25.9% | 64 | 9.9% |
| Sal Frelick | 590 | 80 | 13.6% | 47 | 8.0% |
| Jackson Chourio | 589 | 121 | 20.5% | 30 | 5.1% |
| Joey Ortiz | 506 | 74 | 14.6% | 27 | 5.3% |
| Andrew Vaughn | 447 | 80 | 17.9% | 31 | 6.9% |
| Jake Bauers | 218 | 59 | 27.1% | 32 | 14.7% |
| Gary Sánchez | 101 | 27 | 26.7% | 4 | 4.0% |
| Garrett Mitchell | 78 | 25 | 32.1% | 7 | 9.0% |
Milwaukee 2025 K% flags: Mitchell (32.1%), Bauers (27.1%), Sanchez (26.7%), Yelich (25.9%) all above 25%. Contreras (12.7% BB%) and Bauers (14.7%) are the walk anchors -- Bauers' combination of 27.1% K% and 14.7% BB% is a true three-true-outcomes profile. Chourio's 5.1% BB% is the surprise given his walk pattern against Pallante specifically.
2M: BATTER BATTED BALL PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson | 398 | 42.0% | 33.4% | 24.6% |
| Masyn Winn | 376 | 39.6% | 34.0% | 26.3% |
| Lars Nootbaar | 376 | 39.1% | 35.4% | 25.5% |
| Iván Herrera | 285 | 52.6% | 21.8% | 25.6% |
| Jordan Walker | 231 | 48.9% | 29.4% | 21.6% |
| Nathan Church | 37 | 67.6% | 21.6% | 10.8% |
| Jimmy Crooks | 27 | 37.0% | 44.4% | 18.5% |
Against Henderson's fly-heavy 2025 profile, the Cardinals lineup skews groundball. Church (67.6% GB in a 37-BIP sample) and Herrera (52.6%) are the top ground-ball bats -- worst matchup fit against a pitcher whose damage is on the ground (21.8% career GB, but grounders go for a .188+ AVG against him). Crooks' 44.4% FB rate is the Cardinals' biggest fly-ball profile -- more park-factor exposure but also more slug upside if Henderson hangs one.
Brewers
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sal Frelick | 458 | 47.8% | 28.8% | 23.4% |
| William Contreras | 454 | 53.1% | 22.9% | 24.0% |
| Jackson Chourio | 426 | 45.1% | 30.3% | 24.6% |
| Brice Turang | 424 | 48.3% | 24.5% | 27.1% |
| Christian Yelich | 400 | 62.3% | 14.0% | 23.8% |
| Joey Ortiz | 400 | 46.3% | 31.5% | 22.3% |
| Andrew Vaughn | 334 | 44.0% | 30.5% | 25.4% |
| Jake Bauers | 125 | 38.4% | 34.4% | 27.2% |
| Gary Sánchez | 59 | 45.8% | 37.3% | 16.9% |
| Garrett Mitchell | 42 | 47.6% | 26.2% | 26.2% |
Milwaukee's 2025 profile is groundball-heavy -- Yelich (62.3%) and Contreras (53.1%) at the top -- which pairs unfavorably against Pallante's 60.2% 2026 GB rate. This is a Pallante-friendly matchup structurally. Bauers has the most air-heavy profile (34.4% FB, 27.2% LD in 2025) and is the profile that can turn on Pallante's rare mistakes. Chourio and Turang are more balanced but their line-drive rates (24.6% and 27.1%) are the reason both have shown up in the BvP threat window.
2N: PITCHER K%/BB% PROFILE
| Pitcher | IP | K | K% | BB | BB% | K/BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andre Pallante | 162.2 | 111 | 15.5% | 62 | 8.7% | 1.79 |
| Logan Henderson | 25.1 | 33 | 33.3% | 8 | 8.1% | 4.13 |
Very different profiles. Pallante 2026 to date: 17.6% K%, 6.8% BB%. Pallante 2025 baseline: 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB -- contact-and-ground, not a strikeout arm. Henderson's 2025 baseline is the opposite -- 33.3% K% and a 4.13 K/BB ratio -- but on only 25.1 IP, so the ratio is not yet load-bearing. His 2026 line so far (30 K, 6 BB in 23.0 IP) tracks the same story on an even smaller sample.
KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST
Chourio vs Pallante (Section 2B). 11 career PA, .600 AVG, 5 walks -- the highest-leverage matchup in the game. Pair with Section 2E: Pallante's .868 second-pass OPS in 2025 amplifies the danger on Chourio's second look.
Turang vs Pallante (Section 2B). 5-for-13 (.385) with no walks and one strikeout in the career sample. Section 2I baserunning: Turang's 24 SB in 2025 turn even a single into a run-scoring position.
Burleson vs Henderson (Section 2C, 2L). Burleson's 2025 vs-RHP line (.296/.353/.478 in 419 PA, 14.5% K%) is the LHB profile most likely to handle Henderson's strikeout rate. He is the Cardinals' clearest edge against the opposing starter.
Situational edges. Cardinals' Romero (88.5% strand, Section 2F) is the leverage arm against Milwaukee's traffic-heavy lineup. Defensively (Section 2J), Winn at SS anchors the groundball conversion behind a Pallante start.
X-factor. Second pass through the order (Section 2E). Both starters have their 2025 vulnerability in the same window: Henderson's .268 AVG on the second pass, Pallante's .868 OPS on the second pass. Whichever offense cashes in the innings 4-6 leverage first likely takes the series finale.
QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES
1. How has Jackson Chourio performed against Andre Pallante in their career?
2. How has Andre Pallante fared against Brice Turang in their career?
3. How has Alec Burleson performed against Logan Henderson in their career?
4. What are Andre Pallante's third-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?
5. What are Alec Burleson's splits vs RHP in 2025?
6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?
7. What is the home run park factor at Busch Stadium in 2025?
700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025