NL CENTRAL STANDINGS

TeamW-LGBStrk
Brewers58-34-L1
Cubs52-406.0W3
Cardinals48-439.5W1
Pirates47-4611.5L1
Reds42-4915.5W1

RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)

DateOppH/AResult
Jul 8MILHomeW 5-1
Jul 7MILHomeL 3-4
Jul 7MILHomeL 2-10
Jul 6MILHomeL 3-4
Jul 5CHCAwayL 4-6
Jul 4CHCAwayW 3-0
Jul 3CHCAwayW 17-1
Jul 2ATLAwayW 11-5
Jul 1ATLAwayL 1-5
Jun 30ATLAwayW 5-3

STARTING PITCHERS

Andre Pallante (R) -- Cardinals

2026 to date: 10-5, 3.60 ERA in 95.0 IP, 70 K / 27 BB, 1.22 WHIP, 60.2% GB rate across 17 starts. He is the club's most durable groundball workload and his 2026 season line is well ahead of his career norm. 2025 baseline: 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB in 162.2 IP. Signature profile is heavy contact-and-ground -- 61.2% GB in the career sample -- which puts pressure on the infield defense to convert.

Logan Henderson -- Brewers

2026 to date: 2-1, 2.74 ERA in 23.0 IP, 30 K / 6 BB, 1.04 WHIP across 5 starts. Very short profile overall -- 25.1 IP in the 2025 sample too. That 2025 line: 33.3% K%, 8.1% BB%, 4.13 K/BB. Extreme air-ball tendency (21.8% GB, 47.3% FB career), meaning fewer worm-burners than Pallante and more decisions in the outfield.

EXPECTED LINEUPS

Cardinals (Projected from 2026-07-08)

#PlayerPosBats2026 RISP AVG2026 RISP OPS
1Wetherholt2BL.316.887
2HerreraDHR.222.717
3Burleson1BL.350.931
4WalkerRFR.3271.075
5NootbaarLFL.115.558
6WinnSSR.227.647
7CrooksCL.3331.052
8Gorman3BL----
9ChurchCFL.275.762

Handedness: 3 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Winn), 6 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Nootbaar, Crooks, Gorman, Church).

Brewers (Projected from 2026-07-08)

#PlayerPosBats2026 RISP AVG2026 RISP OPS
NoneVaughn1BR.265.747
NonePerkinsCFS----
NoneTurang2BL.3251.013
NoneYelichDHL.286.777
NonePrattSSR.111.349
NoneHamilton3BL----
NoneMitchellCFL.319.954
NoneSánchezCR.262.992
NoneChourioLFR.254.691
NoneBauers1BL.3001.066
NoneOrtizSSR.218.652
NoneFrelickRFL.227.545
NoneContrerasCR.281.812

Handedness: 6 RHB (Vaughn, Pratt, Sánchez, Chourio, Ortiz, Contreras), 6 LHB (Turang, Yelich, Hamilton, Mitchell, Bauers, Frelick), 1 SHB (Perkins).

INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES

Both lineup cards are projected from the prior day's game. No injury or roster-move data is available for tonight; play what actually posts closer to first pitch.

Series context: Milwaukee leads the 5-game set 3-1. Tonight is the finale at Busch.

2A: BVP -- CARDINALS BATTERS VS OPPONENT STARTER

No data available for this section.

No Cardinals batter has ever faced Logan Henderson in the career BvP sample -- Henderson has only 25.1 IP on record, so the empty sheet is expected, not a data gap. The scouting angle has to come from his 2025 splits (Section 2D, 2E) rather than history.

Bench note: No bench BvP history against Henderson either. Fermin, Jordan, Velazquez, Pages, and Torres are all first looks.

2B: BVP -- OPPONENT BATTERS VS CARDINALS STARTER

PlayerPAABHAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Brice Turang13135.385.385.462001
Christian Yelich12122.167.167.417103
William Contreras13123.250.308.583111
Sal Frelick1191.111.273.222020
Jackson Chourio1153.600.7271.000051
Garrett Mitchell652.400.500.400011
Joey Ortiz641.250.250.250000
Jake Bauers531.333.600.667022
Gary Sánchez221.500.500.500000

Small sample: Garrett Mitchell (6 PA), Joey Ortiz (6 PA), Jake Bauers (5 PA), Gary Sánchez (2 PA).

Chourio has done everything but hit a homer against Pallante: 3-for-5 with 5 walks in 11 career PA (.727 OBP, 1.000 SLG). That is the one at-bat to circle every time he stands in. Turang (5-for-13, .385) is the other real threat -- also with essentially no swing-and-miss (1 K). Yelich and Contreras each own a career HR off Pallante in double-digit PA, which is why the .167 and .250 averages still look scary in the SLG column.

Bench note: Bauers (5 PA, .333/.600/.667) and Mitchell (6 PA, .400/.500/.400) both have promising small samples if they enter late. Ortiz (.250) and Sanchez (2 PA) are neutral.

DANGER BAT: Jackson Chourio

.600 AVG / .727 OBP / 1.000 SLG in 11 PA against Pallante. Only 5 official at-bats -- the walks are doing much of the work -- but the walk rate itself is the tell: Pallante has not been able to find the strike zone with anything Chourio respects. In an 11 PA sample, 5 unintentional walks is a signal, not noise. Do not give him extra pitches; if it looks like a two-strike battle, take it.

2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- CARDINALS

PlayerPAAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Alec Burleson L419.296.353.478153259
Lars Nootbaar L403.249.340.394104772
Masyn Winn R374.251.309.36872371
Iván Herrera R328.268.343.399102466
Jordan Walker R289.200.263.29142194
Nathan Church L51.114.216.1821314
Jimmy Crooks L38.108.132.1620015

Henderson is right-handed, so the 2025 vs-RHP sample is what applies. Burleson leads the group at .296/.353/.478 in 419 PA -- the deepest and cleanest lefty profile Cardinals have. Nootbaar's OBP (.340) plays even when the average dips. Walker is the RHB most exposed, .200 in 289 PA vs RHP. Wetherholt and Gorman have no 2025 vs-RHP sample yet, and both start tonight -- they are profile bets, not history bets.

2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- OPPONENT

PlayerPAAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
William Contreras R502.263.349.409145992
Brice Turang L489.274.352.4471653117
Jackson Chourio R464.249.283.435162091
Christian Yelich L461.271.356.4932551114
Sal Frelick L442.278.342.421123859
Joey Ortiz R380.203.261.27252657
Andrew Vaughn R335.227.272.385121964
Jake Bauers L214.244.360.42883156
Gary Sánchez R59.245.322.4914216
Garrett Mitchell L54.208.278.3330521

Pallante is right-handed. Milwaukee's 2025 vs-RHP profiles read heavy at the top -- Contreras .263/.349/.409, Turang .274/.352/.447, Yelich .271/.356/.493 with 25 HR. Chourio has the loudest slug (.435) in 464 PA. Ortiz (.203) and Mitchell (.208) are the two soft spots in the split. Perkins and Hamilton have no 2025 vs-RHP sample.

2D: PITCHER PLATOON SPLITS

PitchervsPAAVGOBPSLGOPSHRK
Logan Hendersonvs LHB60.167.250.352.602318
Logan Hendersonvs RHB39.216.256.216.472015
Andre Pallantevs LHB347.266.329.434.7631060
Andre Pallantevs RHB368.275.345.429.7741151

Henderson runs a small but strong platoon profile: .167 AVG / .602 OPS vs LHB in 60 PA, with 3 HR allowed being the only worry point, and .216 / .472 OPS vs RHB in 39 PA. The Cardinals stack 6 LHB tonight -- historically Henderson's stronger side by average, but also the side where his 3 HR have landed. Pallante is essentially neutral (.774 vs RHB, .763 vs LHB), which fits his heavy-contact ground-ball profile.

2D-HA: PITCHER HOME/AWAY SPLITS

PitcherSplitBFIPERAKBBHR
Logan HendersonAway5914.12.511752
Logan HendersonHome4011.00.821631
Andre PallanteAway37584.24.89673511
Andre PallanteHome34078.05.42442710

Tonight's game is at Busch Stadium. Henderson pitching away (2.51 ERA in 14.1 IP road career), Pallante pitching at home (5.42 ERA in 78.0 IP career). Pallante's split is the outlier here: he has actually been meaningfully worse at home than on the road across the career sample, and the K/9 tells the same story (44 K in 78 home IP vs 67 K in 84.2 road IP).

2E: TTO SPLITS (TIMES THROUGH ORDER)

PitcherTTOPAAVGSLGOPSHRKBB
Logan HendersonTTO145.143.214.4141173
Logan HendersonTTO245.268.439.7722114
Logan HendersonTTO39.000.000.111051
Andre PallanteTTO1279.266.393.72063521
Andre PallanteTTO2270.309.487.86884627
Andre PallanteTTO3166.217.408.69173014

Both starters share a second-pass problem in 2025. Henderson: .143 AVG on the first pass through the order, .268 AVG on the second pass -- and the third-pass sample (9 PA) is basically nonexistent because he has not been asked to work that deep. Pallante's second-pass line is worse -- .309 / .868 OPS -- and his third-pass numbers actually rebound (.217 AVG). Both games likely turn in innings 4-6.

2F: INHERITED RUNNERS PROFILE

RelieverIRScoredStrand%
Kyle Leahy291162.1%
JoJo Romero26388.5%
Matt Svanson261350.0%
Gordon Graceffo11554.5%
Riley O'Brien10370.0%
Michael McGreevy30100.0%

Romero (88.5%) sits well above league average (~68-72% strand rate). Svanson (50.0%) and Graceffo (54.5%) are the two arms most likely to concede an inherited run. The decision point tonight is who Marmol reaches for if Pallante puts runners on in the fifth or sixth -- Romero is the answer that keeps damage contained; the other two open the door.

2G: BATTED BALL MATCHUP

Pitcher Batted Ball Profiles (Career)

PitcherBIPGB%FB%LD%
Logan Henderson5521.8%47.3%29.1%
Andre Pallante51561.2%18.3%19.6%

Hitter Batted Ball Results (Career) -- MIL

HitterGB AVGLD AVGFB AVG
Jake Bauers.188.765.070
Jackson Chourio.307.581.101
William Contreras.241.651.067
Sal Frelick.269.682.076
Garrett Mitchell.200.636.182
Joey Ortiz.281.449.087
Gary Sánchez.2221.000.000
Brice Turang.327.609.077
Andrew Vaughn.197.659.059
Christian Yelich.245.632.125

Pallante's 61.2% career GB rate collides with a Milwaukee lineup led by ground-ball hitters. Yelich hits the ball on the ground more than most (62.3% GB in 2025) and gets very little out of his fly balls (.125 career on FB). That is a Pallante-friendly profile. The exception is Chourio, whose GB average (.307 career) is the highest in the group -- a groundball off Pallante is not a certain out from his bat. Turang's .327 GB AVG is the same problem. On the Cardinals side, Henderson's 47.3% career FB rate meets a lineup with modest fly-ball tendencies (Nootbaar 35.4%, Burleson 33.4% in 2025) -- more flies means more park factor exposure.

2H: BATTERY PAIRING

CatcherGIPERAAVGOBPSLG
Pedro Pagés1576.14.60.257----
Yohel Pozo837.26.93.303----
Jimmy Crooks523.14.24.258----
Iván Herrera523.24.56.271----

Tonight's scheduled catcher is Jimmy Crooks. Yohel Pozo appears in the pairing data (8 G, 37.2 IP) but is not on the current active roster; his line reflects earlier-season work. Among catchers still on the roster, Crooks has the lowest ERA with Pallante (4.24 in 5 games) and Herrera (4.56) is close behind. Pages carries the largest sample (15 G, 4.60 ERA). Small samples throughout -- this is a call-sequencing story more than an ERA story, and Crooks is the reader to trust with his 2025 pairing.

2I: BASERUNNING MATCHUP

Milwaukee is the running team in this matchup. 2025 SB leaders in the lineup:

-- Brice Turang: 24 SB, 8 CS, 75.0% success rate. The lineup's top volume threat.

-- Jackson Chourio: 21 SB, 7 CS, 75.0% success rate. Danger-bat and danger-runner in one.

-- Sal Frelick: 19 SB, 6 CS, 76.0% success rate.

-- Christian Yelich: 16 SB, 6 CS, 72.7% success rate.

-- Joey Ortiz: 14 SB, 3 CS, 82.4% success rate.

-- Jake Bauers: 8 SB, 1 CS, 88.9% success rate.

-- William Contreras: 6 SB, 4 CS, 60.0% success rate.

-- Garrett Mitchell: 3 SB, 0 CS, 100% success rate.

Cardinals catcher is Crooks, and Pallante's 60.2% GB rate this year has kept opposing runners in check by design -- fewer strikes on the ground means fewer stealing situations. The tension tonight is whether the Brewers cash in the running-game leverage on any early walk or single.

2J: DEFENSIVE CONTEXT

PlayerPOSGDPEFld%
Masyn WinnSS1296430.994
Jordan WalkerRF108240.981
Lars NootbaarLF107001.000
Alec Burleson1B502740.990
Alec BurlesonLF41001.000
Alec BurlesonRF34110.983
Lars NootbaarRF23001.000
Nathan ChurchCF18001.000
Jimmy CrooksC14001.000
Iván HerreraC14010.989
Lars NootbaarCF12010.967
Nathan ChurchRF7010.833
Nathan ChurchLF5001.000
Iván HerreraLF4001.000
Alec BurlesonP100--

Tonight's Cardinals alignment (per the projected card): Winn at SS, Walker at RF, Nootbaar at LF, Burleson at 1B, Church in CF, Crooks behind the plate. With Pallante on the mound and a 60.2% GB rate this year, the infield does the heaviest lifting -- Winn's 129 games at short with 64 DP and just 3 E (.994 Fld%) is the anchor. Burleson at 1B (50 G, .990) is the other big groundball converter. Church in CF has a clean 18-game sample. Herrera is at DH tonight, not behind the plate.

2K: BALLPARK CONTEXT & HEAD-TO-HEAD

Busch Stadium plays historically as a pitcher-leaning venue. The available data does not carry a numeric park factor, so treat it qualitatively -- neither a home-run haven nor a bat-suppressing extreme. Recent head-to-head against Milwaukee: 6-7 in 2025, 5-8 in 2024, 5-8 in 2023, 10-9 in 2022. The Brewers have won each of the last three season series. Tonight's 5-game set is set to fall to Milwaukee 3-2 or 4-1 depending on the result.

2L: BATTER K%/BB% PROFILE

Cardinals

PlayerPAKK%BBBB%
Lars Nootbaar58311920.4%6411.0%
Alec Burleson5447914.5%397.2%
Masyn Winn53710219.0%346.3%
Iván Herrera4508418.7%439.6%
Jordan Walker39612631.8%297.3%
Nathan Church651827.7%34.6%
Jimmy Crooks461737.0%00.0%

Two 2025 K% flags on the Cardinals side: Crooks (37.0%) and Walker (31.8%) both above the 25% high-K threshold. Nootbaar (11.0% BB%) is the walk anchor. Crooks' 0.0% BB% in 46 PA is a small-sample outlier to note against a strike-thrower like Henderson.

Brewers

PlayerPAKK%BBBB%
Brice Turang65915022.8%6610.0%
William Contreras65912018.2%8412.7%
Christian Yelich64416725.9%649.9%
Sal Frelick5908013.6%478.0%
Jackson Chourio58912120.5%305.1%
Joey Ortiz5067414.6%275.3%
Andrew Vaughn4478017.9%316.9%
Jake Bauers2185927.1%3214.7%
Gary Sánchez1012726.7%44.0%
Garrett Mitchell782532.1%79.0%

Milwaukee 2025 K% flags: Mitchell (32.1%), Bauers (27.1%), Sanchez (26.7%), Yelich (25.9%) all above 25%. Contreras (12.7% BB%) and Bauers (14.7%) are the walk anchors -- Bauers' combination of 27.1% K% and 14.7% BB% is a true three-true-outcomes profile. Chourio's 5.1% BB% is the surprise given his walk pattern against Pallante specifically.

2M: BATTER BATTED BALL PROFILE

Cardinals

PlayerBIPGB%FB%LD%
Alec Burleson39842.0%33.4%24.6%
Masyn Winn37639.6%34.0%26.3%
Lars Nootbaar37639.1%35.4%25.5%
Iván Herrera28552.6%21.8%25.6%
Jordan Walker23148.9%29.4%21.6%
Nathan Church3767.6%21.6%10.8%
Jimmy Crooks2737.0%44.4%18.5%

Against Henderson's fly-heavy 2025 profile, the Cardinals lineup skews groundball. Church (67.6% GB in a 37-BIP sample) and Herrera (52.6%) are the top ground-ball bats -- worst matchup fit against a pitcher whose damage is on the ground (21.8% career GB, but grounders go for a .188+ AVG against him). Crooks' 44.4% FB rate is the Cardinals' biggest fly-ball profile -- more park-factor exposure but also more slug upside if Henderson hangs one.

Brewers

PlayerBIPGB%FB%LD%
Sal Frelick45847.8%28.8%23.4%
William Contreras45453.1%22.9%24.0%
Jackson Chourio42645.1%30.3%24.6%
Brice Turang42448.3%24.5%27.1%
Christian Yelich40062.3%14.0%23.8%
Joey Ortiz40046.3%31.5%22.3%
Andrew Vaughn33444.0%30.5%25.4%
Jake Bauers12538.4%34.4%27.2%
Gary Sánchez5945.8%37.3%16.9%
Garrett Mitchell4247.6%26.2%26.2%

Milwaukee's 2025 profile is groundball-heavy -- Yelich (62.3%) and Contreras (53.1%) at the top -- which pairs unfavorably against Pallante's 60.2% 2026 GB rate. This is a Pallante-friendly matchup structurally. Bauers has the most air-heavy profile (34.4% FB, 27.2% LD in 2025) and is the profile that can turn on Pallante's rare mistakes. Chourio and Turang are more balanced but their line-drive rates (24.6% and 27.1%) are the reason both have shown up in the BvP threat window.

2N: PITCHER K%/BB% PROFILE

PitcherIPKK%BBBB%K/BB
Andre Pallante162.211115.5%628.7%1.79
Logan Henderson25.13333.3%88.1%4.13

Very different profiles. Pallante 2026 to date: 17.6% K%, 6.8% BB%. Pallante 2025 baseline: 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB -- contact-and-ground, not a strikeout arm. Henderson's 2025 baseline is the opposite -- 33.3% K% and a 4.13 K/BB ratio -- but on only 25.1 IP, so the ratio is not yet load-bearing. His 2026 line so far (30 K, 6 BB in 23.0 IP) tracks the same story on an even smaller sample.

KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST

Chourio vs Pallante (Section 2B). 11 career PA, .600 AVG, 5 walks -- the highest-leverage matchup in the game. Pair with Section 2E: Pallante's .868 second-pass OPS in 2025 amplifies the danger on Chourio's second look.

Turang vs Pallante (Section 2B). 5-for-13 (.385) with no walks and one strikeout in the career sample. Section 2I baserunning: Turang's 24 SB in 2025 turn even a single into a run-scoring position.

Burleson vs Henderson (Section 2C, 2L). Burleson's 2025 vs-RHP line (.296/.353/.478 in 419 PA, 14.5% K%) is the LHB profile most likely to handle Henderson's strikeout rate. He is the Cardinals' clearest edge against the opposing starter.

Situational edges. Cardinals' Romero (88.5% strand, Section 2F) is the leverage arm against Milwaukee's traffic-heavy lineup. Defensively (Section 2J), Winn at SS anchors the groundball conversion behind a Pallante start.

X-factor. Second pass through the order (Section 2E). Both starters have their 2025 vulnerability in the same window: Henderson's .268 AVG on the second pass, Pallante's .868 OPS on the second pass. Whichever offense cashes in the innings 4-6 leverage first likely takes the series finale.

QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES

1. How has Jackson Chourio performed against Andre Pallante in their career?

2. How has Andre Pallante fared against Brice Turang in their career?

3. How has Alec Burleson performed against Logan Henderson in their career?

4. What are Andre Pallante's third-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?

5. What are Alec Burleson's splits vs RHP in 2025?

6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?

7. What is the home run park factor at Busch Stadium in 2025?

700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025