NL CENTRAL STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brewers | 50-30 | - | L1 |
| Cubs | 45-38 | 6.5 | W1 |
| Cardinals | 42-38 | 8.0 | L4 |
| Pirates | 41-42 | 10.5 | L2 |
| Reds | 39-42 | 11.5 | W2 |
NL EAST STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braves | 49-32 | - | L1 |
| Phillies | 46-37 | 4.0 | L1 |
| Marlins | 44-39 | 6.0 | W4 |
| Nationals | 42-42 | 8.5 | W1 |
| Mets | 35-48 | 15.0 | W1 |
RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)
| Date | Opp | H/A | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27 | MIA | Home | L 1-5 |
| Jun 26 | MIA | Home | L 0-4 |
| Jun 24 | ARI | Home | L 4-9 |
| Jun 23 | ARI | Home | L 3-4 |
| Jun 22 | ARI | Home | W 3-2 |
| Jun 21 | KC | Away | W 12-10 |
| Jun 19 | KC | Away | L 5-6 |
| Jun 18 | KC | Away | L 6-14 |
| Jun 17 | SD | Home | L 1-6 |
| Jun 16 | SD | Home | W 3-2 |
STARTING PITCHERS
Kyle Leahy (R, STL): 2026 to date -- 5-4, 4.24 ERA, 76.1 IP, 62 K, 28 BB, 1.51 WHIP across 15 GS. 2025 baseline: 88.0 IP, 22.0% K, 7.7% BB, 2.86 K/BB. 2025 vs LHB OPS .701, vs RHB OPS .589 -- the right-handed contact bats are the easier outs. 2025 home/away split is stark: 4.47 ERA at home across 44.1 IP, 2.68 ERA on the road -- pitching at Busch today.
Tyler Phillips (R, MIA): 2026 to date -- 1-2, 3.09 ERA, 58.1 IP, 49 K, 30 BB, 1.37 WHIP across 5 GS. 2025 baseline: 77.2 IP, 16.6% K, 7.7% BB, 2.17 K/BB. Walk rate has spiked in 2026 (11.9% BB% vs 7.7% in 2025). 2025 vs LHB line .195 / .291 / .316 / .607 OPS in 151 PA -- six left-handed Cardinals bats this afternoon. 2025 away ERA 2.27 across 39.2 IP -- on the road in St. Louis today.
EXPECTED LINEUPS
Cardinals (Projected from 2026-06-27)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wetherholt | 2B | L | .304 | .860 |
| 2 | Herrera | DH | R | .203 | .705 |
| 3 | Burleson | 1B | L | .341 | .907 |
| 4 | Walker | RF | R | .298 | .949 |
| 5 | Nootbaar | LF | L | .100 | .569 |
| 6 | Winn | SS | R | .209 | .592 |
| 7 | Crooks | C | L | .333 | 1.052 |
| 8 | Gorman | 3B | L | -- | -- |
| 9 | Church | CF | L | .257 | .586 |
Handedness: 3 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Winn), 6 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Nootbaar, Crooks, Gorman, Church).
Marlins (Projected from 2026-06-27)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Navarreto | C | R | .000 | .000 |
| None | Ruiz | RF | R | .188 | .701 |
| None | Conine | LF | L | .100 | .650 |
| None | Hernández | LF | R | .234 | .728 |
| None | Marsee | CF | L | .265 | .798 |
| None | Sanoja | 3B | R | .276 | .674 |
| None | Mack | C | L | .280 | .653 |
| None | Stowers | LF | L | .215 | .654 |
| None | Jiménez | 3B | R | .000 | .133 |
| None | Lopez | SS | R | .300 | .642 |
| None | Caissie | RF | L | .298 | .852 |
| None | Edwards | 2B | S | .301 | .837 |
Handedness: 6 RHB (Navarreto, Ruiz, Hernández, Sanoja, Jiménez, Lopez), 5 LHB (Conine, Marsee, Mack, Stowers, Caissie), 1 SHB (Edwards).
INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES
No injury or roster-move data is available for today.
2A: BVP -- CARDINALS BATTERS VS OPPONENT STARTER
| Player | PA | AB | H | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jordan Walker | 1 | 1 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Iván Herrera | 1 | 1 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Small sample: Alec Burleson (1 PA), Jordan Walker (1 PA), Iván Herrera (1 PA).
Only three Cardinals carry any career row against Phillips, and every row is a single PA. Burleson 1-for-1 with a hit, Walker 0-for-1 with a strikeout, Herrera 0-for-1 with a strikeout -- cosmetic. The Cardinals are essentially facing Phillips blind, so the matchup is decided by Phillips' 2025 vs LHB profile (.195 / .291 / .316) rather than any history hook.
Bench note: Wetherholt, Nootbaar, Winn, Crooks, Gorman, Church -- no career rows vs Phillips. No bench BvP history either (Pagés, Fermín, Velázquez, Torres, Jordan -- no rows).
2B: BVP -- OPPONENT BATTERS VS CARDINALS STARTER
| Player | PA | AB | H | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otto Lopez | 2 | 2 | 0 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Small sample: Otto Lopez (2 PA).
One career row: Lopez 0-for-2 with a strikeout. The rest of the Marlins' projected pool (Edwards, Stowers, Sanoja, Hernández, Marsee, Conine, Caissie, Mack, Navarreto, Jiménez, Ruiz) is facing Leahy without a history hook. With no leverage on history, the matchup leans on Leahy's 2025 vs LHB / vs RHB profile (.252 / .337 / .364 vs LHB; .238 / .270 / .319 vs RHB).
Bench note: No additional bench BvP rows vs Leahy outside Lopez.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- CARDINALS
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson L | 419 | .296 | .353 | .478 | 15 | 32 | 59 |
| Lars Nootbaar L | 403 | .249 | .340 | .394 | 10 | 47 | 72 |
| Masyn Winn R | 374 | .251 | .309 | .368 | 7 | 23 | 71 |
| Iván Herrera R | 328 | .268 | .343 | .399 | 10 | 24 | 66 |
| Jordan Walker R | 289 | .200 | .263 | .291 | 4 | 21 | 94 |
| Nathan Church L | 51 | .114 | .216 | .182 | 1 | 3 | 14 |
| Jimmy Crooks L | 38 | .108 | .132 | .162 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Six left-handed bats (Wetherholt, Burleson, Nootbaar, Crooks, Gorman, Church) and three right-handed bats (Herrera, Walker, Winn) -- all face the right-handed Phillips. Burleson L is the cleanest 2025 vs RHP line at .296 / .353 / .478 in 419 PA. Nootbaar L brings .249 / .340 with 47 BB in 403 PA -- the patience profile is the secondary path. Walker R is the roughest 2025 vs RHP line at .200 / .263 / .291 with 94 K in 289 PA. Church L and Crooks L are tiny 2025 vs RHP samples (51 and 38 PA) and both AVG under .115 -- Wetherholt has no 2025 vs RHP sample in this dataset.
2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- OPPONENT
| Player | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Edwards B | 421 | .306 | .368 | .391 | 3 | 35 | 57 |
| Otto Lopez R | 403 | .270 | .333 | .413 | 12 | 32 | 52 |
| Kyle Stowers L | 356 | .297 | .377 | .597 | 24 | 39 | 106 |
| Javier Sanoja R | 209 | .249 | .288 | .399 | 3 | 12 | 22 |
| Heriberto Hernández R | 170 | .270 | .347 | .439 | 6 | 16 | 41 |
| Jakob Marsee L | 153 | .274 | .359 | .437 | 2 | 16 | 30 |
| Griffin Conine L | 63 | .224 | .286 | .379 | 2 | 5 | 19 |
| Owen Caissie L | 27 | .192 | .222 | .346 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Leo Jiménez R | 11 | .000 | .000 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Brian Navarreto R | 8 | .286 | .250 | .429 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Esteury Ruiz R | 5 | .250 | .400 | .250 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
The Marlins' projected pool has six right-handed bats, five lefties, and Edwards as a switch hitter -- all face the right-handed Leahy. Stowers L is the slug profile at .297 / .377 / .597 vs RHP in 2025 with 24 HR in 356 PA -- by far the loudest bat in the room and the angle that produced 2 RBI off Pallante yesterday. Edwards S is .306 / .368 / .391 vs RHP in 421 PA -- the contact engine. Lopez R is .270 / .333 / .413 with 12 HR. Caissie L (27 PA) and Jiménez R (11 PA) are tiny 2025 samples; Mack has no 2025 vs RHP sample on file.
2D: PITCHER PLATOON SPLITS
| Pitcher | vs | PA | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | vs LHB | 163 | .252 | .337 | .364 | .701 | 3 | 37 |
| Kyle Leahy | vs RHB | 200 | .238 | .270 | .319 | .589 | 2 | 43 |
| Tyler Phillips | vs LHB | 151 | .195 | .291 | .316 | .607 | 3 | 24 |
| Tyler Phillips | vs RHB | 162 | .253 | .290 | .383 | .673 | 5 | 28 |
Both pitchers are right-handers whose 2025 splits run the conventional direction -- stronger vs same-handed bats. Leahy in 2025 was tighter vs RHB (.238 / .270 / .319 / .589 OPS in 200 PA) and slightly more permissive vs LHB (.252 / .337 / .364 / .701 OPS, 19 BB in 163 PA). The Marlins' 5 LHB + 1 SHB pool tilts the at-bats toward Leahy's weaker side. Phillips' 2025 vs LHB line is the standout: .195 / .291 / .316 / .607 OPS, but with 18 BB in 151 PA -- the suppression is real, the walks are real. STL's 6 LHB walk into both halves of that profile.
2D-HA: PITCHER HOME/AWAY SPLITS
| Pitcher | Split | BF | IP | ERA | K | BB | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | Away | 173 | 43.2 | 2.68 | 46 | 13 | 2 |
| Kyle Leahy | Home | 190 | 44.1 | 4.47 | 34 | 15 | 3 |
| Tyler Phillips | Away | 162 | 39.2 | 2.27 | 30 | 17 | 3 |
| Tyler Phillips | Home | 151 | 38.0 | 3.32 | 22 | 7 | 5 |
Today's game is at Busch Stadium -- Leahy pitching home, Phillips pitching away. Both are in opposite halves of their 2025 ERA splits. Leahy's 2025 home ERA was 4.47 (44.1 IP) vs 2.68 on the road; he is in his weaker context. Phillips' 2025 away ERA was 2.27 (39.2 IP) vs 3.32 at home; he is in his stronger context. Structurally, the venue tilts the matchup toward Phillips.
2E: TTO SPLITS (TIMES THROUGH ORDER)
| Pitcher | TTO | PA | AVG | SLG | OPS | HR | K | BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | TTO1 | 355 | .247 | .341 | .645 | 5 | 76 | 28 |
| Kyle Leahy | TTO2 | 8 | .125 | .250 | .375 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Tyler Phillips | TTO1 | 298 | .230 | .350 | .642 | 7 | 50 | 22 |
| Tyler Phillips | TTO2 | 15 | .154 | .385 | .652 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Both starters' 2025 first pass through the order is the meaningful sample -- Leahy 355 PA (.247 / .645 OPS), Phillips 298 PA (.230 / .642 OPS). Nearly identical first-pass profiles. The TTO2 rows are tiny in both cases (Leahy 8 PA, Phillips 15 PA) -- they are 2025 bullpen-only appearances rather than meaningful starter samples, and neither line should drive an editorial call today. The decision point is whether either starter gets through the second pass cleanly at all -- both are predominantly first-pass arms in this 2025 dataset.
2F: INHERITED RUNNERS PROFILE
| Reliever | IR | Scored | Strand% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | 29 | 11 | 62.1% |
| JoJo Romero | 26 | 3 | 88.5% |
| Matt Svanson | 26 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Gordon Graceffo | 11 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Riley O'Brien | 10 | 3 | 70.0% |
| Michael McGreevy | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
League average strand rate: ~68-72%. Romero is the elite arm in this group at 88.5% (26 IR, 3 scored) -- the leverage call if a STL starter exits with men on. McGreevy is 3-for-3 on a tiny sample. Svanson 50.0% (13 of 26 scored) and Graceffo 54.5% (5 of 11) are the danger arms -- well below league average. O'Brien sits at 70.0% (10 IR, 3 scored), close to league average. Leahy's 62.1% (29 IR, 11 scored) is his bullpen-mode sample and not relevant to today's start.
2G: BATTED BALL MATCHUP
Pitcher Batted Ball Profiles (2025)
| Pitcher | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | 249 | 44.2% | 26.9% | 27.7% |
| Tyler Phillips | 227 | 57.3% | 23.3% | 18.9% |
Hitter Batted Ball Results (2025) -- MIA
| Hitter | GB AVG | LD AVG | FB AVG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Caissie | .000 | .500 | .250 |
| Griffin Conine | .192 | .750 | .100 |
| Xavier Edwards | .290 | .560 | .126 |
| Heriberto Hernández | .325 | .725 | .077 |
| Leo Jiménez | .100 | .000 | .000 |
| Otto Lopez | .227 | .542 | .079 |
| Jakob Marsee | .278 | .683 | .186 |
| Brian Navarreto | .286 | -- | .333 |
| Esteury Ruiz | .429 | .000 | .000 |
| Javier Sanoja | .287 | .443 | .045 |
| Kyle Stowers | .271 | .696 | .178 |
Phillips runs a heavy 2025 GB profile (57.3% on 227 BIP) -- well above the league benchmark of 47.0% GB%. Leahy is closer to neutral at 44.2% GB on 249 BIP. The Marlins' projected pool is the GB-leaning side: Lopez (50.4% GB 2025), Edwards (47.9% GB 2025), Sanoja (47.3% GB 2025), and Conine (50.0% GB 2025) are all in the high-grounder pocket -- those at-bats end softly into a Leahy GB profile that is near league average. The Cardinals' side leans the other way: Nootbaar (39.1% GB 2025), Winn (39.6% GB 2025), and Burleson (42.0% GB 2025) hit fewer grounders, and Phillips' 57.3% GB profile is the structural counterweight -- expect a lot of one-hop contact early.
2H: BATTERY PAIRING
| Catcher | G | IP | ERA | AVG | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro Pagés | 43 | 62.0 | 3.05 | .225 | -- | -- |
| Yohel Pozo | 13 | 16.0 | 2.25 | .259 | -- | -- |
| Jimmy Crooks | 4 | 6.1 | 8.53 | .346 | -- | -- |
| Iván Herrera | 4 | 3.0 | 6.00 | .308 | -- | -- |
Tonight's scheduled catcher per the Cardinals lineup card is Jimmy Crooks (position C, order 7). Pagés (43 G / 62.0 IP / 3.05 ERA) is the high-IP, low-ERA pairing with Leahy in the 2025 sample. Pozo (13 G / 16.0 IP / 2.25 ERA) is NOT on the current Cardinals active roster -- those innings are reference context only. The Crooks-Leahy 2025 sample is just 6.1 IP at 8.53 ERA and a .346 opponent AVG -- the smallest pairing in the dataset and the loudest negative line. A thin-pairing battery is its own scouting angle: unfamiliar pop-time calibration and signal sequencing, particularly in the first pass through the order against an Edwards-Lopez top of the order that runs aggressively.
2I: BASERUNNING MATCHUP
Xavier Edwards: 27 SB / 7 CS (79.4% success). MIA's primary running threat at the top of the order.
Otto Lopez: 15 SB / 6 CS (71.4% success). Second runner in the top half.
Jakob Marsee: 14 SB / 6 CS (70.0% success). Speed in the middle of the order.
Javier Sanoja: 6 SB / 5 CS (54.5% success). Stole two yesterday off Pallante / Crooks -- but the career success rate is a coin flip.
Kyle Stowers: 5 SB / 1 CS (83.3% success). Power bat with a small but efficient running sample.
Esteury Ruiz: 4 SB / 0 CS (100.0% success). Pinch-run candidate.
Heriberto Hernández: 1 SB / 1 CS (50.0% success). Token threat.
Crooks-Leahy is a thin battery in the 2025 sample (6.1 IP) -- the running game is the live variable any time Edwards, Lopez, Marsee, or Stowers reaches.
2J: DEFENSIVE CONTEXT
| Player | POS | G | DP | E | Fld% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masyn Winn | SS | 129 | 64 | 3 | 0.994 |
| Jordan Walker | RF | 108 | 2 | 4 | 0.981 |
| Lars Nootbaar | LF | 107 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | 1B | 50 | 27 | 4 | 0.990 |
| Alec Burleson | LF | 41 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | RF | 34 | 1 | 1 | 0.983 |
| Lars Nootbaar | RF | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Nathan Church | CF | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Jimmy Crooks | C | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Iván Herrera | C | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0.989 |
| Lars Nootbaar | CF | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0.967 |
| Nathan Church | RF | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0.833 |
| Nathan Church | LF | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Iván Herrera | LF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Alec Burleson | P | 1 | 0 | 0 | -- |
Tonight's defensive alignment per the Cardinals lineup card: Wetherholt at 2B, Burleson at 1B, Gorman at 3B, Winn at SS, Nootbaar in LF, Church in CF, Walker in RF, Crooks behind the plate, Herrera DH. Winn's primary 2026 fielding sample is the standout (129 G at SS, .994 Fld%, 64 DP). Walker has logged 108 G at RF (.981 Fld%, 4 E) -- the deepest sample at his position tonight. Wetherholt's 2B and Gorman's 3B do not appear in the 2026 fielding sample shown (utility rotation through earlier in the season). The Phillips GB profile (57.3% in 2025) puts a lot of one-hops on the left side -- Winn's range is the structural backstop.
2K: BALLPARK CONTEXT & HEAD-TO-HEAD
Busch Stadium has played as a roughly neutral venue historically -- park-factor numerics are not in the available 2K data; treat as neutral context until the head-to-head sample builds out.
Recent head-to-head (Cardinals W-L vs MIA): 2025 3-3, 2024 3-3, 2023 4-3, 2022 4-2. A dead-even rivalry in 2024 and 2025. The current series sits at MIA leading 2-0 with today's matchup deciding the sweep.
2L: BATTER K%/BB% PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lars Nootbaar | 583 | 119 | 20.4% | 64 | 11.0% |
| Alec Burleson | 544 | 79 | 14.5% | 39 | 7.2% |
| Masyn Winn | 537 | 102 | 19.0% | 34 | 6.3% |
| Iván Herrera | 450 | 84 | 18.7% | 43 | 9.6% |
| Jordan Walker | 396 | 126 | 31.8% | 29 | 7.3% |
| Nathan Church | 65 | 18 | 27.7% | 3 | 4.6% |
| Jimmy Crooks | 46 | 17 | 37.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
2025 strikeout rates: Crooks (37.0%) and Walker (31.8%) are the high-K bats. Church (27.7%) is also above the league benchmark of 22.1% K%. Nootbaar (20.4%), Winn (19.0%), Herrera (18.7%), and Burleson (14.5%) are at or under the benchmark. The bottom third of the order -- Crooks, Gorman, Church -- is where Phillips' elevated 2026 K% (19.4% vs 16.6% baseline) is most likely to land.
Marlins
| Player | PA | K | K% | BB | BB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Edwards | 619 | 88 | 14.2% | 49 | 7.9% |
| Otto Lopez | 594 | 82 | 13.8% | 44 | 7.4% |
| Kyle Stowers | 457 | 125 | 27.4% | 48 | 10.5% |
| Javier Sanoja | 342 | 41 | 12.0% | 19 | 5.6% |
| Heriberto Hernández | 294 | 77 | 26.2% | 31 | 10.5% |
| Jakob Marsee | 234 | 48 | 20.5% | 22 | 9.4% |
| Griffin Conine | 86 | 25 | 29.1% | 7 | 8.1% |
| Leo Jiménez | 32 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 6.3% |
| Owen Caissie | 27 | 11 | 40.7% | 1 | 3.7% |
| Esteury Ruiz | 23 | 8 | 34.8% | 2 | 8.7% |
| Brian Navarreto | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
2025 strikeout rates: Caissie (40.7%, 27 PA) and Ruiz (34.8%, 23 PA) are the highest, but on small samples. Among the meaningful samples Conine (29.1%), Stowers (27.4%), and Hernández (26.2%) are above the league 22.1% K%. Sanoja's 12.0% K% in 342 PA is the contact anchor in the middle. Edwards (14.2%) and Lopez (13.8%) are the high-contact 1-2 -- Leahy will not pile up easy K's against the top of the order. Stowers's combination of slug (.597 vs RHP) and elevated K% (27.4%) is the danger-bat profile: he punishes mistakes, but the punch-out path exists.
2M: BATTER BATTED BALL PROFILE
Cardinals
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alec Burleson | 398 | 42.0% | 33.4% | 24.6% |
| Masyn Winn | 376 | 39.6% | 34.0% | 26.3% |
| Lars Nootbaar | 376 | 39.1% | 35.4% | 25.5% |
| Iván Herrera | 285 | 52.6% | 21.8% | 25.6% |
| Jordan Walker | 231 | 48.9% | 29.4% | 21.6% |
| Nathan Church | 37 | 67.6% | 21.6% | 10.8% |
| Jimmy Crooks | 27 | 37.0% | 44.4% | 18.5% |
2025 contact mix: Burleson, Winn, and Nootbaar all live in the 39-42% GB / 33-35% FB pocket -- they put the ball in the air enough to use Phillips' 57.3% GB-leaning profile against the grain. Crooks's 44.4% FB% (small sample, 27 BIP) is the outlier in the lineup. Church's 67.6% GB% in a 37-BIP sample is the extreme -- against a GB-heavy starter, that compounds into ground-out traffic.
Marlins
| Player | BIP | GB% | FB% | LD% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xavier Edwards | 453 | 47.9% | 24.5% | 27.6% |
| Otto Lopez | 446 | 50.4% | 25.6% | 24.0% |
| Javier Sanoja | 258 | 47.3% | 25.6% | 27.1% |
| Kyle Stowers | 249 | 43.0% | 29.3% | 27.7% |
| Heriberto Hernández | 169 | 45.6% | 30.8% | 23.7% |
| Jakob Marsee | 156 | 46.2% | 27.6% | 26.3% |
| Griffin Conine | 52 | 50.0% | 19.2% | 30.8% |
| Leo Jiménez | 20 | 50.0% | 30.0% | 20.0% |
| Owen Caissie | 14 | 28.6% | 28.6% | 42.9% |
| Esteury Ruiz | 11 | 63.6% | 27.3% | 9.1% |
| Brian Navarreto | 10 | 70.0% | 30.0% | 0.0% |
2025 contact mix: Lopez (50.4% GB) and Sanoja (47.3% GB) feed grounders into Leahy's 44.2% GB profile -- those at-bats end softly to the Winn-Wetherholt-Burleson infield. Edwards (47.9% GB, 27.6% LD) is the line-drive engine at the top of the order. Stowers's 43.0% GB / 27.7% LD mix is the most balanced contact profile in the room -- combined with his .597 SLG vs RHP, that line-drive rate is the elevated extra-base risk.
2N: PITCHER K%/BB% PROFILE
| Pitcher | IP | K | K% | BB | BB% | K/BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Leahy | 88.0 | 80 | 22.0% | 28 | 7.7% | 2.86 |
| Tyler Phillips | 77.2 | 52 | 16.6% | 24 | 7.7% | 2.17 |
2025 baselines: Leahy 22.0% K% / 7.7% BB% / 2.86 K/BB. Phillips 16.6% K% / 7.7% BB% / 2.17 K/BB. Identical walk rates in 2025; Leahy holds the K-rate edge. The 2026 to-date pictures: Leahy 18.3% K% / 8.3% BB% across 76.1 IP -- slightly diminished from the 2025 baseline but in the same shape. Phillips 19.4% K% / 11.9% BB% across 58.1 IP -- the K rate has climbed, but the walk rate has jumped considerably above the 2025 baseline. Phillips' walks are the structural seam to attack today.
KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST
Burleson vs Phillips. Burleson L is .296 / .353 / .478 vs RHP in 2025 across 419 PA with 15 HR (Section 2C). Phillips' 2025 vs LHB line is .195 / .291 / .316 (Section 2D), and his 2026 BB% has spiked to 11.9% (Section 2N) -- this is the cleanest 1-vs-1 mismatch in the matchup card. Burleson is also 1-for-1 against Phillips in their career (Section 2A), but the 1-PA sample is cosmetic.
Stowers vs Leahy. Stowers L is .297 / .377 / .597 vs RHP in 2025 with 24 HR (Section 2C). Leahy's 2025 vs LHB line is .252 / .337 / .364 / .701 OPS (Section 2D) -- workable, but Stowers's 27.4% K% (Section 2L) is the one path to a quiet AB. Stowers drove in 2 of yesterday's 5 MIA runs off Pallante; Leahy is also right-handed.
Edwards on the bases vs the Crooks-Leahy battery. Edwards is 27-for-34 SB in 2025 (79.4% success, Section 2I). The Crooks-Leahy pairing is just 6.1 IP together in the 2025 sample at 8.53 ERA (Section 2H). Any time Edwards reaches against Leahy, the running game is the live variable -- and Marsee (14 SB), Lopez (15 SB), and Stowers (5 SB, 83.3%) are all live behind him.
X-factor: Phillips' first pass through the order. Phillips' 2025 first-pass OPS is .642 in 298 PA (Section 2E) -- the meaningful sample. The Cardinals have not solved him in the first time through, so the front-half innings are where the run-scoring structure stays low. If Burleson and Nootbaar do not find traffic in their first PA off him, Phillips can run his 57.3% GB profile (Section 2G) through quietly.
QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES
1. How has Alec Burleson performed against Tyler Phillips in their career?
2. How has Kyle Leahy fared against Kyle Stowers in their career?
3. How has JoJo Romero performed against Xavier Edwards in their career?
4. What are Kyle Leahy's third-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?
5. What are Kyle Stowers's splits vs RHP in 2025?
6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?
7. What is the home run park factor at Busch Stadium in 2025?
700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025