NL CENTRAL STANDINGS
| Team | W-L | GB | Strk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brewers | 29-18 | - | W3 |
| Cubs | 29-21 | 1.5 | L5 |
| Cardinals | 28-21 | 2.0 | L2 |
| Pirates | 26-24 | 4.5 | W2 |
| Reds | 26-24 | 4.5 | W2 |
RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)
| Date | Opp | H/A | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21 | PIT | Home | L 2-6 |
| May 20 | PIT | Home | L 0-7 |
| May 19 | PIT | Home | W 9-6 (10) |
| May 17 | KC | Home | L 0-2 |
| May 16 | KC | Home | W 4-2 |
| May 15 | KC | Home | W 5-4 (11) |
| May 14 | OAK | Away | W 5-4 |
| May 13 | OAK | Away | L 2-6 |
| May 12 | OAK | Away | W 6-4 |
| May 10 | SD | Away | L 2-3 (10) |
STARTING PITCHERS
Kyle Leahy (R) -- Cardinals
2026 to date: 5-3, 3.94 ERA, 1.55 WHIP across 9 GS / 45.2 IP. 34 K against 20 BB (16.6% K%, 9.8% BB%). Heavy ground-ball profile at 56.2% GB%. 6 HR allowed on 51 H. The walk rate is the open question -- elevated traffic into a hitter-leaning venue is the risk lever tonight.
Chris Paddack (R) -- Reds
2026 to date: 0-5, 7.07 ERA, 1.63 WHIP across 7 GS / 35.2 IP. 30 K against 11 BB (17.8% K%, 6.5% BB%). 49.4% GB%. 6 HR allowed on 47 H. The K and BB rates are workable, but the contact quality has been punishing -- a 7.07 ERA with 6 HR in 35.2 IP says the strike-zone misses are getting hit hard.
EXPECTED LINEUPS
Cardinals (Projected from 2026-05-21)
| # | Player | Pos | Bats | 2026 RISP AVG | 2026 RISP OPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wetherholt | 2B | L | .324 | .928 |
| 2 | Herrera | DH | R | .257 | .858 |
| 3 | Burleson | 1B | L | .339 | .899 |
| 4 | Walker | RF | R | .286 | .924 |
| 5 | Gorman | 3B | L | .220 | .651 |
| 6 | Winn | SS | R | .190 | .550 |
| 7 | Church | CF | L | .222 | .540 |
| 8 | Saggese | LF | R | .158 | .411 |
| 9 | Pagés | C | R | .129 | .402 |
Handedness: 5 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Winn, Saggese, Pagés), 4 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Gorman, Church).
Reds (From active roster)
13 players listed from active roster pool. Actual game lineup will be 9 from this group.
| Player | Pos | Bats |
|---|---|---|
| Dunn | RF | R |
| Myers | CF | R |
| Cruz | SS | S |
| Bleday | LF | L |
| Hayes | 3B | R |
| McLain | 2B | R |
| Lowe | DH | L |
| Higgins | C | R |
| Stewart | 1B | R |
| Steer | LF | R |
| Friedl | CF | L |
| Stephenson | C | R |
| Benson | RF | L |
Handedness: 8 RHB (Dunn, Myers, Hayes, McLain, Higgins, Stewart, Steer, Stephenson), 4 LHB (Bleday, Lowe, Friedl, Benson).
INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES
No injury or roster-move notes available for today.
KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST
Jordan Walker vs Chris Paddack. Walker's .286 AVG and .924 OPS in RISP situations meet a Paddack profile that has surrendered 6 HR in 35.2 IP. He is the cleanup bat built to punish a 7.07-ERA arm that keeps traffic on (1.63 WHIP).
Nathaniel Lowe vs Kyle Leahy. Lowe homered yesterday in St. Louis against the Cardinals' bullpen and brings the left-handed power Cincinnati's lineup needs. Leahy's 9.8% BB% and 1.55 WHIP point to extra at-bats for the Reds' middle order.
Wetherholt + Burleson vs Paddack. The top of the order is hot in RISP spots -- Wetherholt .324 AVG / .928 OPS, Burleson .339 / .899. Paddack's 1.63 WHIP keeps the basepaths busy, exactly what those two need to convert.
X-factor. Leahy carries a 56.2% GB%. If Cincinnati's right-handed-heavy lineup (8 RHB, 4 LHB, 1 switch) elevates against him at Great American Ball Park, his ground-ball formula breaks down. Watch JoJo Romero and Matt Svanson in the high-leverage relief lanes once Leahy turns the order over.
QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES
1. How has Jordan Walker performed against Chris Paddack in their career?
2. How has Nathaniel Lowe fared against Kyle Leahy in their career?
3. How has JoJo Romero performed against Nathaniel Lowe in their career?
4. What are Chris Paddack's third-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?
5. What are Jordan Walker's splits vs RHP in 2025?
6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?
7. What is the home run park factor at Great American Ball Park in 2025?
700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025