NL CENTRAL STANDINGS

TeamW-LGBStrk
Cubs27-14-L2
Brewers22-163.5W4
Cardinals23-173.5L2
Pirates22-195.0L1
Reds22-195.0W2

AL WEST STANDINGS

TeamW-LGBStrk
Athletics21-19-L1
Mariners20-222.0W1
Rangers19-222.5L1
Angels16-266.0L1
Astros16-266.0L3

RECENT RESULTS (LAST 10)

DateOppH/AResult
Jul 7MILHomeL 0-0
May 10SDAwayL 2-3 (10)
May 9SDAwayL 2-4
May 8SDAwayW 6-0
May 7SDAwayW 2-1
May 6MILHomeL 2-6
May 4MILHomeW 6-3
May 3LADHomeL 1-4
May 2LADHomeW 3-2
May 1LADHomeW 7-2

STARTING PITCHERS

Andre Pallante (R) -- STL

2026 to date: 3-3, 4.34 ERA, 37.1 IP, 29 K, 16 BB, 1.37 WHIP, 5 HR across 7 starts. Heavy ground-ball lean (62.2% 2026 GB%) with a 17.6% 2026 K% and 9.7% BB%. 2025 baseline: 162.2 IP, 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB. Pallante is on the road tonight, which is his stronger 2025 context: 4.89 ERA away in 84.2 IP versus 5.42 at home in 78.0 IP. The platoon profile is flat -- 2025 vs LHB .266/.329/.434 (.763 OPS) and vs RHB .275/.345/.429 (.774 OPS) -- so there is no handedness lane to attack on the Oakland side.

Jeffrey Springs (L) -- OAK

2026 to date: 3-2, 3.89 ERA, 44.0 IP, 39 K, 12 BB, 1.14 WHIP, 7 HR across 8 starts. 2026 GB% 40.0%, K% 21.5%, BB% 6.6%. 2025 baseline: 171.0 IP, 19.4% K%, 7.6% BB%, 2.56 K/BB. Springs pitches at home tonight, which is his weaker venue split: 4.81 ERA home in 82.1 IP versus 3.45 away in 88.2 IP, with 17 HR allowed at home vs 11 on the road. His platoon line is the reverse of the usual L-on-L pattern -- 2025 vs RHB .235/.296/.436 (.732 OPS) is tougher on the AVG/OBP than vs LHB .241/.292/.368 (.660 OPS), but the SLG opens up against RHB.

EXPECTED LINEUPS

Cardinals (Projected from 2026-05-10)

#PlayerPosBats2026 RISP AVG2026 RISP OPS
1Wetherholt2BL.310.800
2HerreraDHR.250.807
3Burleson1BL.340.922
4WalkerRFR.267.949
5Gorman3BL.227.666
6WinnSSR.222.624
7ChurchCFL.250.627
8SaggeseLFR.158.411
9PagésCR.160.494

Handedness: 5 RHB (Herrera, Walker, Winn, Saggese, Pagés), 4 LHB (Wetherholt, Burleson, Gorman, Church).

Athletics (From active roster)

13 players listed from active roster pool. Actual game lineup will be 9 from this group.

PlayerPosBats
RookerRFR
Harris3BR
CortesRFL
ThomasRFR
Hernaiz3BR
WilsonSSR
McNeil2BL
HeimCS
ButlerRFL
Kurtz1BL
LangeliersCR
SoderstromLFL
GelofCFR

Handedness: 7 RHB (Rooker, Harris, Thomas, Hernaiz, Wilson, Langeliers, Gelof), 5 LHB (Cortes, McNeil, Butler, Kurtz, Soderstrom).

INJURIES & ROSTER NOTES

No injury or roster-move data is present in the Phase 1 JSON for today.

2A: BVP -- CARDINALS BATTERS VS OPPONENT STARTER

PlayerPAABHAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Pedro Pagés442.500.500.500001
Nolan Gorman442.500.500.500001
Masyn Winn642.500.667.750010
Alec Burleson330.000.000.000001
Thomas Saggese220.000.000.000001
Ivan Herrera320.000.333.000011
Jordan Walker220.000.000.000000

Small sample: Pedro Pagés (4 PA), Nolan Gorman (4 PA), Masyn Winn (6 PA), Alec Burleson (3 PA), Thomas Saggese (2 PA), Ivan Herrera (3 PA), Jordan Walker (2 PA).

Career BvP rows here top out at 6 PA -- below any meaningful threshold. Winn 2-for-4 with a walk, Pagés 2-for-4, and Gorman 2-for-4 are the only positive lines; Burleson, Saggese, and Walker are hitless in 2-3 PA each, and Herrera carries a walk on 3 PA. None of these samples cross the danger threshold (10+ PA, .400+ AVG), so this lineup is essentially facing Springs blind from a BvP standpoint. The 2C platoon and 2D pitcher splits do the real analytical work.

Bench note: No significant bench BvP history vs Springs in the JSON (Scott II, Fermín, Pozo, Prieto -- no rows).

2B: BVP -- OPPONENT BATTERS VS CARDINALS STARTER

PlayerPAABHAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Jeff McNeil771.143.143.143001
Jonah Heim221.500.500.500000

Small sample: Jeff McNeil (7 PA), Jonah Heim (2 PA).

Only two Athletics in the active-roster pool have any career BvP vs Pallante: McNeil 1-for-7 (.143) with a strikeout, and Heim 1-for-2 (.500, tiny). The other 11 names on Oakland's pool -- including the two biggest threats vs RHP (Kurtz, Rooker) -- have never faced Pallante. The 2C and 2L data sets are doing all the analytical work for this lineup.

Bench note: No significant bench BvP history vs Pallante in the JSON.

2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- CARDINALS

PlayerPAAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Masyn Winn R163.255.313.34921131
Alec Burleson L127.271.310.3983720
Ivan Herrera R124.330.455.66091918
Pedro Pagés R113.243.292.3592735
Jordan Walker R107.255.318.3472832
Nolan Gorman L93.220.301.43951025
Thomas Saggese R68.273.279.3481120
Nathan Church L14.417.417.500004

Springs is left-handed, so this 2025 vs LHP slate is what the Cardinals face tonight. Herrera's .330/.455/.660 over 124 PA is the headline -- a slugging-and-walk profile that dwarfs anything else in the lineup. The four RHB names of consequence (Herrera, Walker, Winn, Pagés) all post above-.290 OBP vs LHP; Saggese .273/.279 has the average but minimal walk profile. The Cardinals' four LHB facing a same-hand starter are the drag: Burleson .271/.310 has the best of them, Gorman .220 with five HR is power-only, Wetherholt has no 2025 vs LHP row in the JSON, and Church's 14 PA sample is too small to lean on. The lineup-card answer is to ride the RHB cluster behind Herrera and Walker in the 2-4 spots.

2C: PLATOON SPLITS -- OPPONENT

PlayerPAAVGOBPSLGHRBBK
Brent Rooker R539.255.322.4802644129
Lawrence Butler L507.246.325.4201753130
Tyler Soderstrom L478.278.356.4912047103
Jacob Wilson R407.302.350.43092231
Shea Langeliers R400.247.310.493213477
Jeff McNeil L355.245.330.426113539
Nick Kurtz L336.336.439.714275197
Jonah Heim B301.214.273.33072257
Darell Hernaiz R140.224.266.2801918
Carlos Cortes L94.303.319.5514320
Zack Gelof R75.194.257.3132630
Colby Thomas R63.203.226.2370124
Brett Harris R53.304.377.3910412

Pallante is right-handed, so this 2025 vs RHP slate is what he faces. Kurtz .336/.439/.714 (336 PA, 27 HR) is the lineup's lethal bat -- the highest SLG against RHP in either team's pool, and the .439 OBP is the disciplined-and-dangerous combo. Soderstrom .278/.356/.491 (20 HR) and Wilson .302/.350/.430 are the secondary on-base anchors. Rooker .255/.322/.480 brings the right-handed power. The thin spots are Hernaiz .224/.266, Gelof .194/.257, and Thomas .203/.226 -- the bottom three should be where Pallante can navigate cleanly. Cortes .303/.319/.551 on a 94 PA sample is a useful bench/depth threat.

2D: PITCHER PLATOON SPLITS

PitchervsPAAVGOBPSLGOPSHRK
Andre Pallantevs LHB347.266.329.434.7631060
Andre Pallantevs RHB368.275.345.429.7741151
Jeffrey Springsvs RHB569.235.296.436.73225111
Jeffrey Springsvs LHB144.241.292.368.660327

Pallante is essentially platoon-neutral: 2025 vs LHB .266/.329/.434 (.763 OPS) and vs RHB .275/.345/.429 (.774 OPS). There is no handedness lane for Oakland to overload -- the 7 RHB / 5 LHB / 1 SHB pool is just the pool. Springs is the more interesting study: 2025 vs RHB .235/.296/.436 (.732 OPS, 25 HR over 569 PA) and vs LHB .241/.292/.368 (.660 OPS). The HR risk lives with the right-handed bats, and the Cardinals carry five (Herrera, Walker, Winn, Saggese, Pagés). The four LHB facing a same-hand starter is the structural drag the lineup card is fighting.

2D-HA: PITCHER HOME/AWAY SPLITS

PitcherSplitBFIPERAKBBHR
Andre PallanteAway37584.24.89673511
Andre PallanteHome34078.05.42442710
Jeffrey SpringsAway36088.23.45692911
Jeffrey SpringsHome35382.14.81692517

Tonight's game is at Sutter Health Park. Pallante is away (84.2 IP, 4.89 ERA, 67 K) -- his stronger 2025 venue context. Springs is home (82.1 IP, 4.81 ERA, 17 HR) -- his weaker context, and the only line in the table where a starter's HR total (17) exceeds his IP-paced expectation. The home/away math favors the road pitcher in both columns: Pallante's 4.89 away ERA narrows the gap on Springs's 4.81 home ERA to nearly nothing.

2E: TTO SPLITS (TIMES THROUGH ORDER)

PitcherTTOPAAVGSLGOPSHRKBB
Andre PallanteTTO1279.266.393.72063521
Andre PallanteTTO2270.309.487.86884627
Andre PallanteTTO3166.217.408.69173014
Jeffrey SpringsTTO1293.264.453.777116224
Jeffrey SpringsTTO2284.233.432.722135321
Jeffrey SpringsTTO3136.184.336.5794239

Pallante's 2025 second pass through the order is his cliff: 270 PA, .309 AVG, .487 SLG, .868 OPS. The .720 OPS first pass through the order tightens to dominance by the third pass through the order (.691 OPS, .217 AVG, 30 K in 166 PA) -- but the middle innings (typical TTO2 window, innings 4-6) are where the offense converts. Springs is the opposite shape: he gets stronger as the game goes on. First pass through the order .777 OPS, second pass .722 OPS, third pass .579 OPS with a .184 AVG. If Oakland is going to get him to the third pass, the Cardinals' offensive runway closes hard.

2F: INHERITED RUNNERS PROFILE

RelieverIRScoredStrand%
Kyle Leahy291162.1%
JoJo Romero26388.5%
Matt Svanson261350.0%
Gordon Graceffo11554.5%
Riley O'Brien10370.0%
Michael McGreevy30100.0%

League average inherited-runner strand is roughly 68-72%. Romero's 88.5% strand on 26 IR is the cleanest fork in the pen -- the right call any time men are on with the game in the balance. Svanson's 50.0% (26 IR, 13 scored) and Graceffo's 54.5% (11 IR, 5 scored) are the leak points; mid-inning entries from either invite trouble against an Oakland lineup that turns walks into runs through Rooker and Kurtz behind them. Leahy at 62.1% on 29 IR is the volume bridge -- below league average but not catastrophic.

2G: BATTED BALL MATCHUP

Pitcher Batted Ball Profiles (Career)

PitcherBIPGB%FB%LD%
Andre Pallante51561.2%18.3%19.6%
Jeffrey Springs49032.7%36.3%30.0%

Hitter Batted Ball Results (Career) -- OAK

HitterGB AVGLD AVGFB AVG
Lawrence Butler.251.582.110
Carlos Cortes.200.900.050
Zack Gelof.450.455.000
Brett Harris.385.778.188
Jonah Heim.175.559.120
Darell Hernaiz.216.474.118
Nick Kurtz.291.790.103
Shea Langeliers.252.633.079
Jeff McNeil.152.645.053
Brent Rooker.244.644.102
Tyler Soderstrom.246.697.109
Colby Thomas.259.846.120
Jacob Wilson.248.639.091

Pallante's career batted-ball profile is the extreme of the table: 61.2% GB, 18.3% FB, 19.6% LD. That collides with an Oakland lineup whose 2025 GB profile is heavy across the board -- Wilson 54.8% GB, Soderstrom 51.5%, Hernaiz 50.7%, Butler 48.6%, Kurtz 44.2%. Ground balls become the play pattern. Where the offense converts is on line drives: Kurtz .790 career LD AVG, Thomas .846, Soderstrom .697, McNeil .645, Wilson .639. Pallante's hits-allowed pattern lives in that LD band when he misses the bottom of the zone. Springs is the opposite at 32.7% career GB / 36.3% FB -- the Cardinals' fly-ball hitters (Gorman 41.7% FB) are the matchup angle, and Sutter Health Park is the unknown.

2H: BATTERY PAIRING

CatcherGIPERAAVGOBPSLG
Pedro Pagés1576.14.60.257----
Yohel Pozo837.26.93.303----
Jimmy Crooks523.14.24.258----
Ivan Herrera523.24.56.271----

Three of the four catchers above are on the Cardinals' active roster: Pagés, Pozo, and Herrera. Jimmy Crooks does not appear in the active rosters payload -- his 5 G / 23.1 IP / 4.24 ERA with Pallante is from a prior-season Cardinals stint and is not in tonight's options. Tonight's scheduled catcher is Pedro Pagés (lineup spot 9), the established workhorse pairing with Pallante: 15 games and 76.1 IP at a 4.60 catcher-ERA -- the largest sample in the table and roughly in line with Pallante's overall 4.34 2026 ERA. Herrera carries five-game/23.2-IP catching history with Pallante (4.56 ERA) but is the DH tonight, not the receiver.

2I: BASERUNNING MATCHUP

Top SB threats facing the Cardinals battery tonight:

-- Lawrence Butler: 22 SB / 7 CS, 75.9% success rate.

-- Tyler Soderstrom: 8 SB / 3 CS, 72.7%.

-- Shea Langeliers: 7 SB / 1 CS, 87.5%.

-- Brent Rooker: 6 SB / 1 CS, 85.7%.

-- Jacob Wilson: 5 SB / 2 CS, 71.4%.

-- Jonah Heim: 3 SB / 0 CS, 100%.

-- Jeff McNeil: 3 SB / 0 CS, 100%.

-- Darell Hernaiz: 3 SB / 4 CS, 42.9%.

-- Colby Thomas: 2 SB / 1 CS, 66.7%.

-- Nick Kurtz: 2 SB / 1 CS, 66.7%.

-- Brett Harris: 1 SB / 0 CS, 100%.

-- Zack Gelof: 1 SB / 2 CS, 33.3%.

Butler is the only true volume threat (22 SB) and a 75.9% rate is workable for the Cardinals battery. Langeliers (87.5%) and Rooker (85.7%) are the efficiency threats on smaller volume. Heim and McNeil are perfect on 3 attempts each -- pick-and-go runners worth tracking in close-and-late spots.

2J: DEFENSIVE CONTEXT

PlayerPOSGDPEFld%
Masyn WinnSS1296430.994
Pedro PagésC110650.994
Jordan WalkerRF108240.981
Nolan Gorman3B541160.950
Alec Burleson1B502740.990
Alec BurlesonLF41001.000
Thomas Saggese2B352440.973
Alec BurlesonRF34110.983
Thomas SaggeseSS33710.988
Nolan Gorman2B28910.990
Thomas Saggese3B18020.939
Nathan ChurchCF18001.000
Ivan HerreraC14010.989
Nathan ChurchRF7010.833
Nolan Gorman1B7401.000
Nathan ChurchLF5001.000
Ivan HerreraLF4001.000
Pedro Pagés1B2101.000
Alec BurlesonP100--
Pedro Pagés2B1001.000

Tonight's defensive alignment per the lineup card: Wetherholt 2B, Burleson 1B, Walker RF, Gorman 3B, Winn SS, Church CF, Saggese LF, Pagés C. Winn at SS is the elite glove (0.994 Fld%, 64 DP over 129 G). Pagés catching at 0.994. Burleson at 1B (0.990) is the established sample. Two starts run against the career fielding sample: Wetherholt has no row in the defense table at all, so 2B tonight is a small-sample bet on a rookie's range; Saggese is in LF for the second straight night despite his career sample being 2B/SS/3B -- the LF assignment is outside his fielding history here. Gorman at 3B carries 0.950 with 6 errors over 54 G -- the soft spot in the infield alignment behind a 62.2% GB starter.

2K: BALLPARK CONTEXT & HEAD-TO-HEAD

Recent head-to-head: 2024: STL 2-1. 2023: STL 2-1. A 4-2 cumulative split across the two-season sample, slightly Cardinals.

Ballpark: Sutter Health Park is the Athletics' current home venue. The 2K data in the JSON does not carry a numeric park factor, so dimension-specific calls are not available -- treat this game as a neutral venue context for run scoring until the head-to-head sample at this park builds out.

2L: BATTER K%/BB% PROFILE

Cardinals

PlayerPAKK%BBBB%
Alec Burleson5447914.5%397.2%
Masyn Winn53710219.0%346.3%
Ivan Herrera4508418.7%439.6%
Nolan Gorman40213633.8%4711.7%
Jordan Walker39612631.8%297.3%
Pedro Pagés38910727.5%194.9%
Thomas Saggese2958328.1%165.4%
Nathan Church651827.7%34.6%

Burleson is the contact anchor: 2025 K% 14.5%, BB% 7.2%. Herrera 2025 K% 18.7% / BB% 9.6% is the disciplined-and-dangerous profile that pairs with his .660 SLG vs LHP. The strikeout-vulnerability spots are Gorman 33.8% K% and Walker 31.8%, both above the danger marker. Below 6% BB% (Pagés, Saggese, Church) are the don't-walk hitters who have to put balls in play against a 7.6% BB% starter.

Athletics

PlayerPAKK%BBBB%
Brent Rooker69815522.2%659.3%
Lawrence Butler63017928.4%599.4%
Tyler Soderstrom62414122.6%558.8%
Jacob Wilson523397.5%275.2%
Shea Langeliers52310319.7%366.9%
Nick Kurtz48815130.9%6312.9%
Jeff McNeil4625511.9%4910.6%
Jonah Heim4338820.3%327.4%
Darell Hernaiz1972412.2%178.6%
Colby Thomas1324937.1%75.3%
Zack Gelof1014645.5%76.9%
Carlos Cortes992020.2%33.0%
Brett Harris842125.0%78.3%

Wilson's 2025 K% 7.5% is the lineup's contact extreme -- pitch-to-contact, ball-in-play guaranteed, the right profile to slap singles against a high-GB starter. Kurtz pairs 30.9% K% with the lineup's only 12.9% BB% -- swing-and-miss with elite walk rates is the boom-or-bust combination. The strikeout-vulnerability cluster (Gelof 45.5%, Thomas 37.1%, Kurtz 30.9%, Butler 28.4%) is the swing-rate lane Pallante can exploit when ahead in the count, but Pallante's 2025 K% of 15.5% is not the profile that maximizes that lane. McNeil 11.9% K% / 10.6% BB% is the on-base nuisance bat low in the pool.

2M: BATTER BATTED BALL PROFILE

Cardinals

PlayerBIPGB%FB%LD%
Alec Burleson39842.0%33.4%24.6%
Masyn Winn37639.6%34.0%26.3%
Ivan Herrera28552.6%21.8%25.6%
Pedro Pagés24344.9%30.9%24.3%
Jordan Walker23148.9%29.4%21.6%
Nolan Gorman19930.2%41.7%28.1%
Thomas Saggese18941.8%29.6%28.6%
Nathan Church3767.6%21.6%10.8%

Springs is a fly-ball pitcher (32.7% career GB), so Gorman's 2025 41.7% FB / 30.2% GB profile is the elevator that lines up with a Springs mistake. Herrera's 52.6% GB rate is the hammer-on-the-ground profile and trades on his .660 SLG vs LHP doing damage when contact stays low. Church's 67.6% GB on a 37 BIP sample is noise more than signal. Burleson's 42 / 33 / 25 spread is the well-rounded contact profile.

Athletics

PlayerBIPGB%FB%LD%
Brent Rooker44139.9%33.3%26.8%
Jacob Wilson43454.8%20.3%24.9%
Tyler Soderstrom39451.5%23.4%25.1%
Lawrence Butler36848.6%24.7%26.6%
Shea Langeliers34741.2%32.9%25.9%
Jeff McNeil33137.8%34.1%28.1%
Jonah Heim29442.9%34.0%23.1%
Nick Kurtz23344.2%29.2%26.6%
Darell Hernaiz14650.7%23.3%26.0%
Carlos Cortes7042.9%28.6%28.6%
Colby Thomas6541.5%38.5%20.0%
Brett Harris5151.0%31.4%17.6%
Zack Gelof4445.5%29.5%25.0%

Pallante 2026 GB% 62.2% (career 61.2%) meets an Oakland lineup that already leans toward ground contact: Wilson 54.8% GB, Soderstrom 51.5%, Harris 51.0%, Hernaiz 50.7%. The collision should produce ground-ball-dominated at-bats throughout the order. The danger zone is the LD% column, where the entire lineup sits between 17.6% and 28.6% -- line drives are how this group beats Pallante when they get under the sinker. Kurtz 44.2% GB / 29.2% FB / 26.6% LD has the most balanced damage profile in the group; he is the bat least suppressed by Pallante's ground tilt.

2N: PITCHER K%/BB% PROFILE

PitcherIPKK%BBBB%K/BB
Andre Pallante162.211115.5%628.7%1.79
Jeffrey Springs171.013819.4%547.6%2.56

2026 to date: Pallante 17.6% K%, 9.7% BB%; Springs 21.5% K%, 6.6% BB%. 2025 baseline: Pallante 15.5% K%, 8.7% BB%, 1.79 K/BB; Springs 19.4% K%, 7.6% BB%, 2.56 K/BB. Springs is the better-command profile in both 2025 and 2026 -- his 2.56 K/BB ratio is well clear of Pallante's 1.79, and his 2026 BB% has tightened to 6.6%. Pallante's 2026 BB% has climbed to 9.7%, above his 2025 baseline -- the walk rate is the marker to watch tonight, especially against a Kurtz / Rooker / Soderstrom cluster that turns baserunners into runs.

KEY MATCHUPS & WATCHLIST

Key Matchups

Iván Herrera vs Jeffrey Springs. Herrera's 2025 vs LHP line is .330/.455/.660 (124 PA, 9 HR) -- the single biggest platoon edge on either side. Career BvP is 0-for-2 with a walk in 3 PA, so the BvP sample is noise. Hitting second feeds him an extra plate appearance, and Springs's 2025 second pass through the order (.722 OPS) and first pass through the order (.777 OPS, 11 HR) are the windows where Herrera does the damage.

Nick Kurtz vs Andre Pallante. Kurtz is the threat: 2025 vs RHP .336/.439/.714 over 336 PA with 27 HR. He has never faced Pallante in the JSON's BvP sample. Pallante's 62.2% 2026 GB% and 1.79 2025 K/BB do not project to neutralize Kurtz's air-ball profile -- if Kurtz gets a mistake elevated, it leaves Sutter Health Park. The 2H battery sets Pagés behind the plate; sequencing matters more than the receiver here.

Jordan Walker vs Jeffrey Springs. Walker's 2025 vs LHP line is .255/.318/.347 (107 PA, 2 HR) -- modest, but he hits cleanup and faces a starter whose 2025 vs RHB SLG (.436) opens up versus his vs LHB (.368). Walker is 0-for-2 BvP, which says nothing.

Bullpen fork. Romero's 88.5% strand rate on 26 IR is the cleanest option once Pallante exits; Svanson's 50.0% on 26 IR is the leak. With Pallante's 2025 second pass through the order (.868 OPS) marking the innings 4-6 window as his cliff, the inning Romero is brought in -- and the inning he isn't -- decides the middle game.

The X-factor: Pallante's TTO2 cliff. 2025 TTO2: 270 PA, .309 AVG, .487 SLG, .868 OPS. If Pallante can navigate the second pass through the order, the third pass through the order tightens back to a .691 OPS. Innings 4-6 are where this game most likely turns.

QUICK REFERENCE -- IN-GAME QUERIES

1. How has Iván Herrera performed against Jeffrey Springs in their career?

2. How has Andre Pallante fared against Nick Kurtz in their career?

3. How has JoJo Romero performed against Lawrence Butler in their career?

4. What are Andre Pallante's third-time-through-the-order splits in 2025?

5. What are Iván Herrera's splits vs LHP in 2025?

6. How often does JoJo Romero strand inherited runners in 2025?

7. What is the home run park factor at Sutter Health Park in 2025?

700 CLARK -- POWERED BY BASES.CHAT | HISTORICAL DATA THROUGH 2025